College student mental health: An evaluation of the DSM-5 self-rated Level 1 cross-cutting symptom measure
The Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure was developed to aid in clinical decision-making for clients seeking psychiatric services and to facilitate empirical investigation of the dimensional nature of mental health issues. Preliminary evidence supports its utility with clinical samples....
Saved in:
Published in | Psychological assessment Vol. 30; no. 10; p. 1382 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.10.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The
Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure was developed to aid in clinical decision-making for clients seeking psychiatric services and to facilitate empirical investigation of the dimensional nature of mental health issues. Preliminary evidence supports its utility with clinical samples. However, the brief, yet comprehensive structure of the
Level 1 measure may benefit a high-risk population that is less likely to seek treatment. College students have high rates of hazardous substance use and co-occurring mental health symptoms, yet rarely seek treatment. Therefore, the current study evaluated the psychometric properties (i.e., construct and criterion-related validity) of the
Level 1 measure with a large, diverse sample of non-treatment-seeking college/university students. Data from 7,217 college students recruited from 10 universities in 10 different states across the United States evidenced psychometric validation of the
Level 1 measure. Specifically, we found acceptable internal consistency across multi-item
domains and moderate to strong correlations among domains (internal validity). Further, several
domains were positively associated with longer, validated measures of the same mental health construct and had similar strengths of associations with substance use outcomes compared to longer measures of the same construct (convergent validity). Finally, all
domains were negatively associated with self-esteem and positively associated with other theoretically relevant constructs, such as posttraumatic stress (criterion-related validity). Taken together, the
Level 1 measure appears to be a viable tool for evaluating psychopathology in college students. Several opportunities for clinical application and empirical investigation of the
Level 1 measure are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1939-134X |
DOI: | 10.1037/pas0000628 |