Adaptation of Capillary Isoelectric Focusing to Microchannels on a Glass Chip
As a first step toward adaptation of capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF) to microchannels on a glass chip, we have compared the three most common mobilization methods: chemical, hydrodynamic, and electroosmotic flow (EOF)-driven mobilization. Using a commercial cIEF apparatus with coated or uncoa...
Saved in:
Published in | Analytical chemistry (Washington) Vol. 71; no. 3; pp. 678 - 686 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington, DC
American Chemical Society
01.02.1999
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | As a first step toward adaptation of capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF) to microchannels on a glass chip, we have compared the three most common mobilization methods: chemical, hydrodynamic, and electroosmotic flow (EOF)-driven mobilization. Using a commercial cIEF apparatus with coated or uncoated fused-silica capillaries, both chemical and hydrodynamic mobilization gave superior separation efficiency and reproducibility. However, EOF-driven mobilization, which occurs simultaneously with focusing, proved most suitable for miniaturization because of high speed, EOF compatibility and low instrumentation requirements. When this method was tested in a 200-μm-wide, 10-μm-deep, and 7-cm-long channel etched into planar glass, a mixture of Cy5-labeled peptides could be focused in less than 30 s, with plate heights of 0.4 μm (410 plates/s) upon optimization. For a total analysis time of less than 5 min, we estimate a maximum peak capacity of approximately 30−40. Interestingly, the order of migration was found to be reversed compared to capillary-based focusing. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/TPS-1ZVXPQ16-S istex:8CA83E2209352388401F12930E466ED50AA57037 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0003-2700 1520-6882 |
DOI: | 10.1021/ac9806660 |