Comparing the Potency of Chemicals with Multiple Modes of Action in Aquatic Toxicology:  Acute Toxicity Due to Narcosis versus Reactive Toxicity of Acrylic Compounds

A series of acrylates and methacrylates was used to illustrate a strategy to compare the importance of two modes of action (MOA) and thereby identify the predominant cause of acute fish toxicity. Acrylic compounds are known to be Michael acceptors and may therefore react with glutathione (GSH), caus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental science & technology Vol. 33; no. 17; pp. 3038 - 3043
Main Authors Freidig, Andreas P, Verhaar, Henk J. M, Hermens, Joop L. M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Chemical Society 01.09.1999
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A series of acrylates and methacrylates was used to illustrate a strategy to compare the importance of two modes of action (MOA) and thereby identify the predominant cause of acute fish toxicity. Acrylic compounds are known to be Michael acceptors and may therefore react with glutathione (GSH), causing GSH-depletion in vivo (reactive mechanism). On the other hand, acrylates may also act by a nonspecific mechanism (narcosis). The following two, physiologically meaningful parameters were calculated in order to estimate the contribution of these two mechanisms to the overall acute toxicity:  (i) a lipid normalized body burden for narcosis and (ii) the potential degree of GSH depletion by chemical reactivity. The degree of GSH depletion was found to be related to the product of the reactivity toward GSH and the exposure concentration. This model was validated with four model compounds and an in vivo study. For both MOA, toxic ratios were calculated and compared for all chemicals in the series. The approach enables the comparison of the contribution to toxicity of chemicals with more than one MOA.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/TPS-2JC5GJGX-G
istex:E5B9CA428E629F02FDEB48C7AC881E4ADB24C847
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0013-936X
1520-5851
DOI:10.1021/es990251b