Benchmark of Bethe-Salpeter for Triplet Excited-States
We have evaluated the accuracy of the Bethe-Salpeter singlet–triplet transition energies as well as singlet–triplet and triplet–triplet splittings for 20 organic molecules, using as reference the CC3 values determined by Thiel and co-workers with both the TZVP and aug-cc-pVTZ atomic basis sets. Our...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of chemical theory and computation Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 767 - 783 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Chemical Society
14.02.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We have evaluated the accuracy of the Bethe-Salpeter singlet–triplet transition energies as well as singlet–triplet and triplet–triplet splittings for 20 organic molecules, using as reference the CC3 values determined by Thiel and co-workers with both the TZVP and aug-cc-pVTZ atomic basis sets. Our excitation energies are obtained on the basis of GW quasiparticle energy levels that are self-consistently converged with respect to the starting DFT eigenvalues. In its current form, BSE/GW is often unable to provide a balanced description of both singlet and triplet excited-states. While the singlet–singlet and triplet–triplet energy separations are obtained accurately, triplets are located too close in energy from the ground-state, by typically −0.55 eV when using standard functionals to generate the starting eigenstates. Applying the Tamm-Dancoff approximation upshifts the BSE triplet energies and allows reducing this error to ca. −0.40 eV, while using M06-HF eigenstates allows a further increase and hence a reduction of the error for triplet states, but at the cost of larger errors for the singlet excited-states. At this stage, the most accurate TD-DFT estimates therefore remain competitive for computing singlet–triplet transition energies. Indeed, with M06-2X, irrespective of the application or not of the Tamm-Dancoff approximation and of the selected atomic basis set, the deviations obtained with TD-DFT are rather small. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1549-9618 1549-9626 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01169 |