Homogeneity as a sociolinguistic motive in Canadian English

A comparative sociolinguistic study of a nation‐wide change in Canada in the 1980s led to the unexpected conclusion that the forces that brought about the homogeneity of inland, urban, middle‐class Canadian English were still functioning. Claims for homogeneity (starting in 1951) had previously been...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld Englishes Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 467 - 477
Main Author CHAMBERS, J. K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A comparative sociolinguistic study of a nation‐wide change in Canada in the 1980s led to the unexpected conclusion that the forces that brought about the homogeneity of inland, urban, middle‐class Canadian English were still functioning. Claims for homogeneity (starting in 1951) had previously been impressionistic, but now more rigorous methods give credence to homogeneity as a sociolinguistic motive by revealing virtually identical progress of incipient sound changes in widely separated urban areas. Sociophonetic studies and real time studies corroborate the persistence of homogeneity in this change. More recent studies shed further light on homogeneity as a sociolinguistic motive. Homogeneity is obviously a form of standardization. Both essentially lead to loss (or levelling) of regional differences. I make the case for homogeneity as a sub‐type of standardization, arguing from distinguishable sociolinguistic attributes in lexical and grammatical changes. Homogeneity appears to be a sociolinguistic motive in some changes to this day.
Bibliography:istex:AE2FDCEDE8CE12687574E0DE5A1C49D2CF3D84B5
ark:/67375/WNG-BX7LS255-4
ArticleID:WENG1774
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0883-2919
1467-971X
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-971X.2012.01774.x