Groundwater–soil–crop relationship with respect to arsenic contamination in farming villages of Bangladesh – A preliminary study

To clarify the groundwater–soil–crop relationship with respect to arsenic (As) contamination, As concentration was measured in tubewell (TW) water, surface soil from farmyards and paddy fields, and fresh taro ( Colocasia esculenta) leaves from farmyards in the farming villages of Bangladesh. The As...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental pollution (1987) Vol. 156; no. 2; pp. 563 - 565
Main Authors Kurosawa, Kiyoshi, Egashira, Kazuhiko, Tani, Masakazu, Jahiruddin, M., Moslehuddin, Abu Zofar Md, Rahman, Zulfikar Md
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2008
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To clarify the groundwater–soil–crop relationship with respect to arsenic (As) contamination, As concentration was measured in tubewell (TW) water, surface soil from farmyards and paddy fields, and fresh taro ( Colocasia esculenta) leaves from farmyards in the farming villages of Bangladesh. The As concentration in TW water from farmyards was at least four times higher than the Bangladesh drinking water standard, and the concentration in fresh taro leaves was equal to or higher than those reported previously for leafy vegetables in Bangladesh. As concentration of surface soils in both farmyards and paddy fields was positively correlated with that of the TW water. Further, the concentration in surface soil was positively correlated with levels in fresh taro leaves in the farmyard. This study, therefore, clarified the groundwater–soil–crop relationship in farmyards and the relationship between groundwater–soil in paddy fields to assess the extent of As contamination in Bangladeshi villages. By extracting arsenic contaminated groundwater from a well, surface soil surrounding the well and crops planted in the surface soil became contaminated with arsenic.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.02.009
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0269-7491
1873-6424
DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2008.02.009