Evaluation of batch leaching procedures for estimating metal mobility in glaciated soils

Batch leaching methods have been used for several decades to estimate the potential release of contaminants from soils. Four batch leaching procedures (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, synthetic precipitation leaching procedure, deionized water leaching procedure, and California waste ext...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGround water monitoring & remediation Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 231 - 240
Main Authors Lackovic, J.A, Nikolaidis, N.P, Chheda, P, Carley, R.J, Patton, E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1997
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Batch leaching methods have been used for several decades to estimate the potential release of contaminants from soils. Four batch leaching procedures (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, synthetic precipitation leaching procedure, deionized water leaching procedure, and California waste extraction test) were evaluated for their ability to realistically quantify the mobility of metals from previously contaminated glaciated soils. The study was conducted using soils from four different sites (three in Connecticut and one in Maine). The results of the batch leaching procedures were compared with a set of continuous column leaching experiments performed at two different flow-rates and two influent pH values. The results suggested that the synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) was more realistic than the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), but still a conservative leaching estimate for evaluating the potential for metal mobility in glaciated soils. This study suggests that using SPLP as a test for estimating metal cleanup levels will result in lower remediation costs relative to TCLP or waste extraction test (WET), but still maintain a high level of confidence in the protection of ground water quality
AbstractList Batch leaching methods have been used for several decades to estimate the potential release of contaminants from soils. Four batch leaching procedures (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, synthetic precitation leaching procedure, deionized water leaching procedure, and California waste extraction test) were evaluated for their ability to realistically quantify the mobility of metals from previously contaminated glaciated soils. The study was conducted using soils from four different sites (three in Connecticut and one in Maine). The results of the batch leaching procedures were compared with a set of continuous column leaching experiments performed at two different flowrates and two influent pH values. The results suggested that the synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) was more realistic than the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), but still a conservative leaching estimate for evaluating the potential for metal mobility in glaciated soils. This study suggests that using SPLP as a test for estimating metal cleanup levels will result in lower remediation costs relative to TCLP or waste extraction test (WET), but still maintain a high level of confidence in the protection of ground water quality.
Abstract Batch leaching methods have been used for several decades to estimate the potential release of contaminants from soils. Four batch leaching procedures (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, synthetic precitation leaching procedure, deionized water leaching procedure, and California waste extraction test) were evaluated for their ability to realistically quantify the mobility of metals from previously contaminated glaciated soils. The study was conducted using soils from four different sites (three in Connecticut and one in Maine). The results of the batch leaching procedures were compared with a set of continuous column leaching experiments performed at two different flowrates and two influent pH values. The results suggested that the synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) was more realistic than the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), but still a conservative leaching estimate for evaluating the potential for metal mobility in glaciated soils. This study suggests that using SPLP as a test for estimating metal cleanup levels will result in lower remediation costs relative to TCLP or waste extraction test (WET), but still maintain a high level of confidence in the protection of ground water quality.
Batch leaching methods have been used for several decades to estimate the potential release of contaminants from soils. Four batch leaching procedures (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, synthetic precipitation leaching procedure, deionized water leaching procedure, and California waste extraction test) were evaluated for their ability to realistically quantify the mobility of metals from previously contaminated glaciated soils. The study was conducted using soils from four different sites (three in Connecticut and one in Maine). The results of the batch leaching procedures were compared with a set of continuous column leaching experiments performed at two different flowrates and two influent pH values. The results suggested that the synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) was more realistic than the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), but still a conservative leaching estimate for evaluating the potential for metal mobility in glaciated soils. This study suggests that using SPLP as a test for estimating metal cleanup levels will result in lower remediation costs relative to TCLP or waste extraction test (WET), but still maintain a high level of confidence in the protection of ground water quality.
Batch leaching methods have been used for several decades to estimate the potential release of contaminants from soils. Four batch leaching procedures (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, synthetic precipitation leaching procedure, deionized water leaching procedure, and California waste extraction test) were evaluated for their ability to realistically quantify the mobility of metals from previously contaminated glaciated soils. The study was conducted using soils from four different sites (three in Connecticut and one in Maine). The results of the batch leaching procedures were compared with a set of continuous column leaching experiments performed at two different flow-rates and two influent pH values. The results suggested that the synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) was more realistic than the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), but still a conservative leaching estimate for evaluating the potential for metal mobility in glaciated soils. This study suggests that using SPLP as a test for estimating metal cleanup levels will result in lower remediation costs relative to TCLP or waste extraction test (WET), but still maintain a high level of confidence in the protection of ground water quality
Author Lackovic, Jeffrey A.
Chheda, Pradeep
Nikolaidis, Nikolaos P.
Carley, Robert J.
Patton, Elsie
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Lackovic, J.A
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Nikolaidis, N.P
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Chheda, P
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Carley, R.J
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Patton, E
BookMark eNqVkF1vFCEUhompiW31J5gQL7ybEYYBFm-MaerapF9qm_aOnGFgy8oOFWZ199-XyTS9lxtIzvs-OTxH6GCIg0XoAyU1LefTuqay5ZXgqqmpUrIeO0K4WtS7V-jwZXRQ3kSoiolGvUFHOa8JYYIv-CG6P_0LYQujjwOODncwmgccLJgHP6zwY4rG9ttkM3YxYZtHvynZMtnYEQLexM4HP-6xH_AqgPEw2h7n6EN-i147CNm-e76P0e2305uT79X51fLs5Ot5BS2XtIIGeGeNVEAVcX3LiOIcWmcI65SwTIiG91IsmO2gbbkF2zreScJ6xxeCGnaMPs7csuufbdlQb3w2NgQYbNxmTQWRpOVNCX6egybFnJN1-jGV36S9pkRPMvVaT8b0ZExPMvWzTL0r5S9z-Z8Pdv8fTb28u_jZMFoI1UzwebS7FwKk31pIJrm-u1xq9kPdSHLP9HXJv5_zDqKGVfJZ3_6a2EQQJSl7AvV0l8g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apgeochem_2018_11_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apgeochem_2019_104494
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enggeo_2014_11_011
crossref_primary_10_1144_geochem2017_034
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2018_11_090
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eti_2017_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1021_es990230h
crossref_primary_10_1080_10807039_2017_1410694
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11368_013_0662_x
crossref_primary_10_4491_eer_2006_11_1_001
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph15040824
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2003_11_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apgeochem_2018_09_009
crossref_primary_10_4491_eer_2006_11_1_014
Cites_doi 10.2134/jeq1984.00472425001300030010x
10.1111/j.1745-6592.1994.tb00476.x
10.1289/ehp.919217
10.1016/0169-7722(95)00097-6
10.1111/j.1745-6592.1994.tb00113.x
10.1520/STP28826S
ContentType Journal Article
DBID FBQ
BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
7TV
7UA
C1K
DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1997.tb00598.x
DatabaseName AGRIS
Istex
CrossRef
Pollution Abstracts
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Pollution Abstracts
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
Pollution Abstracts

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Geography
EISSN 1745-6592
EndPage 240
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_j_1745_6592_1997_tb00598_x
GWMR231
ark_67375_WNG_3Q9T70X3_P
US1997060971
Genre article
GroupedDBID -DZ
.3N
.4S
.DC
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29I
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
4P2
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
A8Z
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABHUG
ABJNI
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABTAH
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXME
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADDAD
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFVGU
AFZJQ
AGJLS
AHEFC
AI.
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ARCSS
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
COF
CS3
D-E
D-F
DC6
DCZOG
DDYGU
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
ECGQY
EDH
EDO
EJD
ESTFP
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FBQ
FEDTE
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HF~
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
H~9
I-F
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
ML.
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TAE
TUS
UB1
VH1
VJK
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WIH
WIK
WLBEL
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
YCJ
ZCA
ZY4
ZZTAW
~02
~IA
~KM
~WT
AAHBH
AHBTC
AITYG
BSCLL
HGLYW
OIG
AAYXX
CITATION
7TV
7UA
C1K
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a4571-a2a5bec79a190fd430955a4fc03b96e36625d7683eba445eae4f5b703df5861c3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1069-3629
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 21:30:06 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 02:50:17 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 01:03:32 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 30 09:53:40 EDT 2024
Wed Dec 27 19:10:41 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a4571-a2a5bec79a190fd430955a4fc03b96e36625d7683eba445eae4f5b703df5861c3
Notes T01
1997060971
ArticleID:GWMR231
ark:/67375/WNG-3Q9T70X3-P
istex:67BD153E2F551343050D15168C54D6BCCC545C79
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 16070452
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_16070452
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1745_6592_1997_tb00598_x
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1745_6592_1997_tb00598_x_GWMR231
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_3Q9T70X3_P
fao_agris_US1997060971
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1997-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1997-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 1997
  text: 1997-00-00
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace Oxford, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford, UK
PublicationTitle Ground water monitoring & remediation
PublicationYear 1997
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References U.S. EPA. 1992. SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, 3rd Edition, Final Update I. Washington , DC : U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
Asikainen, J.M., and N.P. Nikolaidis. 1994. Sequential extraction of chromium from contaminated aquifer sediments. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 14, no. 2:185-191.
Chheda, P., N.P. Nikolaidis, and R.J. Carley. 1995. Manual of standard operating procedures-The development of mobility-based unsaturated zone cleanup standards for heavy metals. Storrs , Connecticut : Environmental Research Institute.
U.S. EPA. 1973b. Federal Register 38, no. 198: 28610-28621.
McLean, J.E., and B.E. Bledsoe. 1992. Behavior of metals in soils. EPA/540/S-92/018. Washington , DC : U.S. EPA.
Hickey, M.G., and J.A. Kittrick. 1984. Chemical partitioning of cadmium, copper, nickel, and zinc in soils and sediments containing high levels of heavy metals. Journal of Environmental Quality 13, no. 3: 372-376.
U.S. EPA. 1986. Federal Register 51, no. 216: 40643-40653.
Mattuck, R., and N.P. Nikolaidis, 1996. Chromium mobility in freshwater wetlands. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 23, no 3: 213-232.
Stumm, W. and J J. Morgan. 1996. Aquatic chemistry, 3rd ed. New York , New York : John Wiley & Sons.
Sobek, A.A., W.A. Schuller, J.R. Freeman, and R.M. Smith. 1978. Field and laboratory methods applicable to overburdens and mine soils. EPA/600/2-78/054. Washington , DC : U.S. EPA.
Bartlett, R.J. 1991. Chromium cycling in soils and water: Links, gaps, and methods. Environmental Health Perspective 92, May: 17-24.
Morel, F.M.M., and J.G. Hering. 1993. Principles and applications of aquatic chemistry. New York , New York : John Wiley & Sons.
U.S. EPA. 1973a. Federal Register 38, no. 94: 12872-12877.
California Code of Regulations, California Waste Extraction Test, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 30, § 66700. California Register 85, no. 2:1800. 78-1800.82.
Nikolaidis, N.P., G.A. Robbins, M. Scherer, B. McAninch, G. Binkhorst, J.M. Asikainen, and S.L. Suib. 1994. Vertical distribution and partitioning of chromium in a glaciofluvial aquifer. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 14, no. 3: 150-59.
Lowenbach, W. 1978. Compilation and evaluation of leaching test methods. EPA/600/2-78/095. Washington , DC : U.S. EPA.
1986; 51
1990
1973a; 38
1984; 13
1991; 92
1986
1994; 14
1996
1973b; 38
1995
1994
1983
1993
1992
1981
85
1978
1996; 23
Morel F.M.M. (e_1_2_1_16_1) 1993
Bartlett R.J. (e_1_2_1_3_1) 1991; 92
(e_1_2_1_4_1); 85
Kimmel T.A. (e_1_2_1_10_1) 1986
U.S. EPA (e_1_2_1_24_1) 1986; 51
Chheda P. (e_1_2_1_5_1) 1995
U.S. EPA (e_1_2_1_25_1) 1992
Friedman D. (e_1_2_1_8_1) 1986
U.S. EPA (e_1_2_1_22_1) 1973; 38
Francis C.W. (e_1_2_1_7_1) 1986
U.S. EPA (e_1_2_1_23_1) 1973; 38
Sobek A.A. (e_1_2_1_20_1) 1978
Wilson D.C. (e_1_2_1_26_1) 1983
Mok W.M. (e_1_2_1_15_1) 1994
McLean J.E. (e_1_2_1_14_1) 1992
Lowenbach W. (e_1_2_1_12_1) 1978
e_1_2_1_13_1
e_1_2_1_2_1
e_1_2_1_11_1
Stumm W. (e_1_2_1_21_1) 1996
e_1_2_1_17_1
Dragun J. (e_1_2_1_6_1) 1990
e_1_2_1_9_1
Nikolaidis N.P. (e_1_2_1_18_1) 1996
e_1_2_1_19_1
References_xml – volume: 14
  start-page: 185
  issue: no. 2
  year: 1994
  end-page: 191
  article-title: Sequential extraction of chromium from contaminated aquifer sediments
  publication-title: Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation
– volume: 23
  start-page: 213
  issue: no 3
  year: 1996
  end-page: 232
  article-title: Chromium mobility in freshwater wetlands
  publication-title: Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
– start-page: 77
  year: 1986
  end-page: 84
– start-page: 7
  year: 1981
  end-page: 27
– start-page: 75
  year: 1990
  end-page: 82
– start-page: 109
  year: 1994
  end-page: 110
– volume: 38
  start-page: 12872
  issue: no. 94
  year: 1973a
  end-page: 12877
  publication-title: Federal Register
– volume: 13
  start-page: 372
  issue: no. 3
  year: 1984
  end-page: 376
  article-title: Chemical partitioning of cadmium, copper, nickel, and zinc in soils and sediments containing high levels of heavy metals
  publication-title: Journal of Environmental Quality
– year: 1996
– year: 1995
– volume: 38
  start-page: 28610
  issue: no. 198
  year: 1973b
  end-page: 28621
  publication-title: Federal Register
– start-page: 69
  year: 1983
  end-page: 81
– volume: 92
  start-page: 17
  year: 1991
  end-page: 24
  article-title: Chromium cycling in soils and water: Links, gaps, and methods
  publication-title: Environmental Health Perspective
– volume: 51
  start-page: 40643
  issue: no. 216
  year: 1986
  end-page: 40653
  publication-title: Federal Register
– year: 1978
– start-page: 36
  year: 1986
  end-page: 53
– start-page: 15
  year: 1986
  end-page: 35
– year: 1992
– year: 1993
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1800
  issue: no. 2
  end-page: 1800
  article-title: California Code of Regulations
  publication-title: California Register
– volume: 14
  start-page: 150
  issue: no. 3
  year: 1994
  end-page: 59
  article-title: Vertical distribution and partitioning of chromium in a glaciofluvial aquifer
  publication-title: Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation
– ident: e_1_2_1_9_1
  doi: 10.2134/jeq1984.00472425001300030010x
– volume-title: Technical report
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_1_18_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Nikolaidis N.P.
– volume: 51
  start-page: 40643
  issue: 216
  year: 1986
  ident: e_1_2_1_24_1
  publication-title: Federal Register
  contributor:
    fullname: U.S. EPA
– volume-title: Behavior of metals in soils
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_1_14_1
  contributor:
    fullname: McLean J.E.
– volume-title: SW‐846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_1_25_1
  contributor:
    fullname: U.S. EPA
– ident: e_1_2_1_17_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1994.tb00476.x
– volume: 38
  start-page: 28610
  issue: 198
  year: 1973
  ident: e_1_2_1_23_1
  publication-title: Federal Register
  contributor:
    fullname: U.S. EPA
– volume-title: Principles and applications of aquatic chemistry
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_1_16_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Morel F.M.M.
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1800
  issue: 2
  ident: e_1_2_1_4_1
  article-title: California Code of Regulations
  publication-title: California Register
– volume-title: Manual of standard operating procedures–The development of mobility‐based unsaturated zone cleanup standards for heavy metals
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_1_5_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Chheda P.
– start-page: 15
  volume-title: Hazardous and industrial solid waste testing: Fourth symposium
  year: 1986
  ident: e_1_2_1_7_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Francis C.W.
– volume-title: Compilation and evaluation of leaching test methods
  year: 1978
  ident: e_1_2_1_12_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Lowenbach W.
– start-page: 109
  volume-title: Arsenic in the environment part I: Cycling and characterization
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_1_15_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Mok W.M.
– volume: 38
  start-page: 12872
  issue: 94
  year: 1973
  ident: e_1_2_1_22_1
  publication-title: Federal Register
  contributor:
    fullname: U.S. EPA
– volume-title: Aquatic chemistry
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_1_21_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Stumm W.
– start-page: 77
  volume-title: Hazardous and industrial solid waste testing: Fourth symposium
  year: 1986
  ident: e_1_2_1_8_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Friedman D.
– ident: e_1_2_1_11_1
– start-page: 75
  volume-title: Petroleum contaminated soils
  year: 1990
  ident: e_1_2_1_6_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Dragun J.
– start-page: 69
  volume-title: Environment and solid wastes: Characterization, treatment, and disposal
  year: 1983
  ident: e_1_2_1_26_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Wilson D.C.
– start-page: 36
  volume-title: Hazardous and industrial solid waste testing: Fourth symposium
  year: 1986
  ident: e_1_2_1_10_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Kimmel T.A.
– volume: 92
  start-page: 17
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_1_3_1
  article-title: Chromium cycling in soils and water: Links, gaps, and methods
  publication-title: Environmental Health Perspective
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.919217
  contributor:
    fullname: Bartlett R.J.
– ident: e_1_2_1_13_1
  doi: 10.1016/0169-7722(95)00097-6
– ident: e_1_2_1_2_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1994.tb00113.x
– ident: e_1_2_1_19_1
  doi: 10.1520/STP28826S
– volume-title: Field and laboratory methods applicable to overburdens and mine soils
  year: 1978
  ident: e_1_2_1_20_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Sobek A.A.
SSID ssj0036585
Score 1.5727845
Snippet Batch leaching methods have been used for several decades to estimate the potential release of contaminants from soils. Four batch leaching procedures...
Abstract Batch leaching methods have been used for several decades to estimate the potential release of contaminants from soils. Four batch leaching procedures...
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
istex
fao
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 231
SubjectTerms CALIFORNIA WASTE EXTRACTION TEST
CONNECTICUT
CONTAMINANTES
CONTAMINANTS
DEIONIZED WATER LEACHING
ESTIMATION
LEACHING
LESSIVAGE DU SOL
LIXIVIACION
MAINE
METAL
METALES
METALS
MOVEMENT IN SOIL
POLLUANT
POLLUTANTS
POLLUTED SOIL
PROCESOS DE TRANSPORTE EN EL SUELO
SOIL TRANSPORT PROCESSES
SOL POLLUE
SUELO CONTAMINADO
SYNTHETIC PRECIPITATION LEACHING
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING
TRANSPORT DANS LE SOL
Title Evaluation of batch leaching procedures for estimating metal mobility in glaciated soils
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-3Q9T70X3-P/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1745-6592.1997.tb00598.x
https://search.proquest.com/docview/16070452
Volume 17
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3PT9swFH7auGyXARuIANt8mHZLldR2HB9hK0XTijagojfLiZ2BYAmirQT89byXpBFFXIZ2tmLF75e_Z7_3GeCLI9Lt3KWh5VqGIi7y0PZdHOZE_s0zjTsgHeiPjpLDsfgxkZO2PZp6YRp-iO7AjTyjjtfk4DabLju5EjKka0FquVPNGadOe4QoY66ovuv7ccclxXGrlfXVZ6JDjNq6ZSDtynqenWppt3pd2AoxLIn_dgmQPoa19b50sAp_FytqylEue_NZ1svvn5A9_q8lr8G7FsCyvcbi1uGVL9_Dm_Yt9fO7DzAZdATirCrYPsb6c_azLdpkdWOCm2OSzxAuswFGGMLMODLymAewUVVX696xi5INryxZjnfspLq4mm7A-GBw-u0wbN9vCK2QKkalW4kmorRF1FE4wYnuzooiJyNIPE8w93KY7nCfWSGkt14UMkMTcYVMkzjnm7BSVqXfApbEVE6n06joa6GdtC7rR5mmfEmrSOUB8IWezHVD02EepTcoNUNSMyQ100rN3AawiSo19g_GUzM-ocEoIVKtAL7WWu7msjeXVAGnpDk7Ghr-W5-qaMLNrwA-L8zAoF_SZYstfTWfGiLuI7r6ANJapf_wW2Z4NjpG3L398k934G3Ds0tnRbuwMruZ-4-InmbZp9orHgBD2AkT
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,1378,4031,27935,27936,27937,46306,46730
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NT9swFH9icGCXfaOFbeDDxC1VUttJfGRbaceaakArerOc2BkIlEzQSrC_fu8laUTRLpt2tmLFfl-_9_z8M8BHS6TbuU18w5X0RVjkvunb0M-J_JtnCiMgFfTTSTSaieO5nG9AuroL0_BDdAU3sozaX5OBU0F63cpjIX06F6Q7d3FT5FRJDyHlFto_p5ccvpx2bFIcg62sDz8j5aPfVi0HadfY88e51uLVk8JUiGJJAHdrkPQhsK0j09FzKFdrahpSrnrLRdbLfz2ie_xvi34Bz1oMyw4bpXsJG658Bdvtc-oX969hPug4xFlVsE_o7i_YuO3bZPXdBLvEPJ8hYmYDdDIEm3EkdZgKsLSqG3bv2WXJhteGlMdZdlZdXt--gdnRYPp55LdPOPhGyDhEuRuJWhIrg8CjsIIT450RRU56EDkeYfplMePhLjNCSGecKGSGWmILmURhzndgs6xK9xZYFFJHnUqCoq-EstLYrB9kilImFQdx7gFfCUr_bJg69IMMB3dN065p2jXd7pq-82AHZarND3SpenZGg0FEvFoeHNRi7uYyN1fUBBdLfT4Zan6ipnEw5_q7B_srPdBomnTeYkpXLW81cfcRY70HSS3Tv_gtPTxPTxF67_77p_uwPZqmYz3-Ovn2Dp42tLtUOnoPm4ubpfuAYGqR7dUm8hvcuA0r
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Nb9MwFH-CIQGX8TmRMTYfELdUSW0n8RFY2wFrNbZV681yYptNG8m0tdLGX897SRqtExcQZytW_L78e_Z7PwO8t0S6XdgsNFzJUMS-CE3fxmFB5N88V7gD0oH-eJLsTcXXmZy17dHUC9PwQ3QHbuQZdbwmB7-0ftXJUyFDuhaklru0OeNUWQ8R5SORIBQmiHTYkUlx3GtlffeZqBDDtmopSLu6nj_OtbJdPfSmQhBL8r9ZQaR3cW29MQ2fwc_lkpp6lPPeYp73il_32B7_15qfw3qLYNnHxuRewANXvoQn7WPqp7evYDboGMRZ5dknDPanbL-t2mR1Z4JdYJbPEC-zAYYYAs04MnaYCLBxVZfr3rKzko0uDJmOs-yoOru4fg3T4eD4817YPuAQGiHTGLVuJNpIqgzCDm8FJ747I3xBVpA4nmDyZTHf4S43QkhnnPAyRxuxXmZJXPANWCur0r0BlsRUT6eyyPeVUFYam_ejXFHCpNIoLQLgSz3py4anQ9_Jb1BqmqSmSWq6lZq-CWADVarNDwyoenpEg1FCrFoBfKi13M1lrs6pBC6V-mQy0vy7Ok6jGdcHAewszUCjY9JtiyldtbjWxNxHfPUBZLVK_-K39OhkfIjAe_PfP92Bxwe7Q73_ZfLtLTxtOHfp3GgL1uZXC_cOkdQ8364d5DeWnwva
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation+of+Batch+Leaching+Procedures+for+Estimating+Metal+Mobility+in+Glaciated+Soils&rft.jtitle=Ground+water+monitoring+%26+remediation&rft.au=Lackovic%2C+Jeffrey+A.&rft.au=Nikolaidis%2C+Nikolaos+P.&rft.au=Chheda%2C+Pradeep&rft.au=Carley%2C+Robert+J.&rft.date=1997&rft.issn=1069-3629&rft.eissn=1745-6592&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=240&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1745-6592.1997.tb00598.x&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_j_1745_6592_1997_tb00598_x
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1069-3629&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1069-3629&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1069-3629&client=summon