Evaluation of batch leaching procedures for estimating metal mobility in glaciated soils

Batch leaching methods have been used for several decades to estimate the potential release of contaminants from soils. Four batch leaching procedures (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, synthetic precipitation leaching procedure, deionized water leaching procedure, and California waste ext...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGround water monitoring & remediation Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 231 - 240
Main Authors Lackovic, J.A, Nikolaidis, N.P, Chheda, P, Carley, R.J, Patton, E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1997
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Batch leaching methods have been used for several decades to estimate the potential release of contaminants from soils. Four batch leaching procedures (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, synthetic precipitation leaching procedure, deionized water leaching procedure, and California waste extraction test) were evaluated for their ability to realistically quantify the mobility of metals from previously contaminated glaciated soils. The study was conducted using soils from four different sites (three in Connecticut and one in Maine). The results of the batch leaching procedures were compared with a set of continuous column leaching experiments performed at two different flow-rates and two influent pH values. The results suggested that the synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) was more realistic than the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), but still a conservative leaching estimate for evaluating the potential for metal mobility in glaciated soils. This study suggests that using SPLP as a test for estimating metal cleanup levels will result in lower remediation costs relative to TCLP or waste extraction test (WET), but still maintain a high level of confidence in the protection of ground water quality
Bibliography:T01
1997060971
ArticleID:GWMR231
ark:/67375/WNG-3Q9T70X3-P
istex:67BD153E2F551343050D15168C54D6BCCC545C79
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1069-3629
1745-6592
DOI:10.1111/j.1745-6592.1997.tb00598.x