Classification of fault breccias and related fault rocks

Despite extensive research on fault rocks, and on their commercial importance, there is no non-genetic classification of fault breccias that can easily be applied in the field. The present criterion for recognizing fault breccia as having no ‘primary cohesion’ is often difficult to assess. Instead w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeological magazine Vol. 145; no. 3; pp. 435 - 440
Main Authors WOODCOCK, N. H., MORT, K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.05.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Despite extensive research on fault rocks, and on their commercial importance, there is no non-genetic classification of fault breccias that can easily be applied in the field. The present criterion for recognizing fault breccia as having no ‘primary cohesion’ is often difficult to assess. Instead we propose that fault breccia should be defined, as with sedimentary breccia, primarily by grain size: with at least 30% of its volume comprising clasts at least 2 mm in diameter. To subdivide fault breccias, we advocate the use of textural terms borrowed from the cave-collapse literature – crackle, mosaic and chaotic breccia – with bounds at 75% and 60% clast content. A secondary breccia discriminant, more difficult to apply in the field, is the ratio of cement to matrix between the clasts. Clast-size issues concerning fault gouge, cataclasite and mylonite are also discussed.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/6GQ-MNZV83GN-0
ArticleID:00488
istex:34E5A8EF7456A9BD886DF36F0D917F1A5B58F58E
PII:S0016756808004883
ISSN:0016-7568
1469-5081
DOI:10.1017/S0016756808004883