Use of historical information in a maximum-likelihood framework

This paper discusses flood-quantile estimators which can employ historical and paleoflood information, both when the magnitudes of historical flood peaks are known, and when only threshold-exceedance information is available. Maximum likelihood, quasi-maximum likelihood and curve fitting methods for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of hydrology (Amsterdam) Vol. 96; no. 1; pp. 215 - 223
Main Authors Cohn, Timothy A., Stedinger, Jery R.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 15.12.1987
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper discusses flood-quantile estimators which can employ historical and paleoflood information, both when the magnitudes of historical flood peaks are known, and when only threshold-exceedance information is available. Maximum likelihood, quasi-maximum likelihood and curve fitting methods for simultaneous estimation of 1, 2 and 3 unknown parameters are examined. The information contained in a 100 yr record of historical observations, during which the flood perception threshold was near the 10 yr flood level (i.e., on average, one flood in ten is above the threshold and hence is recorded), is equivalent to roughly 43, 64 and 78 years of systematic record in terms of the improvement of the precision of 100 yr flood estimators when estimating 1, 2 and 3 parameters, respectively. With the perception threshold at the 100 yr flood level, the historical data was worth 13, 20 and 46 years of systematic data when estimating 1, 2 and 3 parameters, respectively.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-1694
1879-2707
DOI:10.1016/0022-1694(87)90154-5