A Reconsideration of the Extension Strain Criterion for Fracture and Failure of Rock

The complex behaviours of rocks and rock masses have presented paradoxes to the rock engineer, including the fracturing of seemingly strong rock under low stress conditions, which often occurs near excavation boundaries. The extension strain criterion was presented as a fracture initiation criterion...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRock mechanics and rock engineering Vol. 49; no. 12; pp. 4667 - 4679
Main Authors Wesseloo, J., Stacey, T. R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Vienna Springer Vienna 01.12.2016
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The complex behaviours of rocks and rock masses have presented paradoxes to the rock engineer, including the fracturing of seemingly strong rock under low stress conditions, which often occurs near excavation boundaries. The extension strain criterion was presented as a fracture initiation criterion under these conditions (Stacey in Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 18:469–474, 1981 ). This criterion has been used successfully by some and criticised by others. In this paper, we review the literature on the extension strain criterion and present a case for the correct interpretation of the criterion and the conditions suitable for its use. We argue that the extension strain criterion can also be used to provide an indication of damage level under conditions of relatively low confining stress. We also present an augmentation of the criterion, the ultimate extension strain, which is applicable under extensional loading conditions when σ 2 is similar in magnitude to σ 1 .
ISSN:0723-2632
1434-453X
DOI:10.1007/s00603-016-1059-0