Directional response of a reconstituted fine-grained soil-Part II: performance of different constitutive models

In this paper, the performance of different advanced constitutive models for soils is evaluated with respect to the experimentally observed behaviour of a soft reconstituted clay subject to a wide range of loading directions, see (presented in the companion paper). The models considered include a th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics Vol. 30; no. 13; pp. 1303 - 1336
Main Authors Mašín, David, Tamagnini, Claudio, Viggiani, Gioacchino, Costanzo, Daniele
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.11.2006
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this paper, the performance of different advanced constitutive models for soils is evaluated with respect to the experimentally observed behaviour of a soft reconstituted clay subject to a wide range of loading directions, see (presented in the companion paper). The models considered include a three‐surface kinematic hardening elastoplastic model; the CLoE hypoplastic model; a recently proposed K‐hypoplastic model for clays, and an enhanced version of the same model incorporating the concept of intergranular strain. A clear qualitative picture of the relative performance of the different models as a function of the loading direction is obtained by means of the incremental strain response envelopes. The definition of suitable error measures allows to obtain further quantitative information in this respect. For the particular initial conditions and loading programme considered in this study, the kinematic hardening and the enhanced K‐hypoplastic models appear to provide the best performance overall. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:ArticleID:NAG527
istex:D4E0EA2CA8DDD584B7A45D86A611AC84DB697D78
ark:/67375/WNG-ZR88R2QC-S
EC 6th FP - No. GAAV IAA200710605; No. SSPI-CT-2003-501837-NOAH'S ARK
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0363-9061
1096-9853
DOI:10.1002/nag.527