A comparative study of memory for olfactory discriminations: Dogs (Canis familiaris), rats (Rattus norvegicus), and humans (Homo sapiens)

• Published in: Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983) Vol. 134; no. 2; p. 170
• Main Authors: Lo, Gordon Ka-Ho, Macpherson, Krista, MacDonald, Hayden, Roberts, William A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.2020
• ISSN: 1939-2087
• DOI: 10.1037/com0000205

Disagreement has arisen in the scientific literature regarding the relative olfactory ability of humans relative to other mammals, specifically canines and rodents. A series of experiments are reported in which memory for multiple olfactory discriminations was measured in dogs, rats, and humans. Participants from all three species learned a sequence of 20 different discriminations between an S + odor and an S- odor. Choice of the S+ odor was rewarded with food for dogs and rats and with positive verbal feedback for humans. After learning the discriminations, an initial memory test was given that involved presentation of all 20 S + and S- pairs. A subsequent mix-and-match test was given in which each S + odor was presented with three different S- odors. The memory tests revealed that dogs were superior to rats and that dogs and rats were superior to humans. The relatively poor performance of humans contrasts with prior findings of high recognition memory for odors followed by slow forgetting. We attribute the low accuracy of humans in our experiments to the requirement that participants had to remember the outcome associated with S + (correct) and S- (incorrect) cues and not just their familiarity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).