Alignment and category learning

Recent research shows that similarity comparisons involve an alignment process in which features are placed into correspondence. In 6 studies, the authors showed that alignment is involved in category learning as well. Within a category, aligned matches (feature matches occurring on the same dimensi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition Vol. 24; no. 1; p. 144
Main Authors Lassaline, M E, Murphy, G L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.1998
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recent research shows that similarity comparisons involve an alignment process in which features are placed into correspondence. In 6 studies, the authors showed that alignment is involved in category learning as well. Within a category, aligned matches (feature matches occurring on the same dimension) facilitate learning more than nonaligned matches do (matches on different dimensions), although nonaligned matches still facilitate learning relative to nonmatches. Analogously, feature matches that cross category boundaries hurt learning more if they occur on the same versus a different dimension, and cross-category feature matches on different dimensions hurt learning relative to nonmatching features. Representational assumptions of category learning models must be modified to account for the differences between aligned and nonaligned feature matches.
ISSN:0278-7393
DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.144