Measurements of Black and Organic Carbon Emission Factors for Household Coal Combustion in China: Implication for Emission Reduction

Household coal combustion is considered as the greatest emission source for black carbon (BC) and an important source for organic carbon (OC) in China. However, measurements on BC and OC emission factors (EFBC and EFOC) are still scarce, which result in large uncertainties in emission estimates. In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental science & technology Vol. 43; no. 24; pp. 9495 - 9500
Main Authors Chen, Yingjun, Zhi, Guorui, Feng, Yanli, Liu, Dongyan, Zhang, Gan, Li, Jun, Sheng, Guoying, Fu, Jiamo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Chemical Society 15.12.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Household coal combustion is considered as the greatest emission source for black carbon (BC) and an important source for organic carbon (OC) in China. However, measurements on BC and OC emission factors (EFBC and EFOC) are still scarce, which result in large uncertainties in emission estimates. In this study, a detailed data set of EFBC and EFOC for household coal burning was presented on the basis of 38 coal/stove combination experiments. These experiments included 13 coals with a wide coverage of geological maturity which were tested in honeycomb-coal-briquette and raw-coal-chunk forms in three typical coal stoves. Averaged values of EFBC are 0.004 and 0.007 g/kg for anthracite in briquette and chunk forms and 0.09 and 3.05 g/kg for bituminous coal, respectively; EFOC are 0.06 and 0.10 g/kg for anthracite and 3.74 and 5.50 g/kg for bituminous coal in both forms, respectively. Coal maturity was found to be the most important influencing factor relative to coal’s burning forms and the stove’s burning efficiency, and when medium-volatile bituminous coals (MVB) are excluded from use, averaged EFBC and EFOC for bituminous coal decrease by 50% and 30%, respectively. According to these EFs, China’s BC and OC emissions from the household sector in 2000 were 94 and 244 gigagrams (Gg), respectively. Compared with previous BC emission estimates for this sector (e.g., 465 Gg by Ohara et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007, 7, 4419−4444), a dramatic decrease was observed and was mainly attributed to the update of EFs. As suggested by this study, if MVB is prohibited as household fuel together with further promotion of briquettes, BC and OC emissions in this sector will be reduced by 80% and 34%, respectively, and then carbonaceous emissions can be controlled to a large extent in China.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0013-936X
1520-5851
DOI:10.1021/es9021766