Molecular Composition of Monoterpene Secondary Organic Aerosol at Low Mass Loading

The molecular composition of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from the ozonolysis of monoterpenes (α-pinene and β-pinene) was studied by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and high-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry techniques, both employing electrospray ioni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental science & technology Vol. 44; no. 20; pp. 7897 - 7902
Main Authors Gao, Yuqian, Hall, Wiley A, Johnston, Murray V
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Chemical Society 15.10.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The molecular composition of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from the ozonolysis of monoterpenes (α-pinene and β-pinene) was studied by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and high-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry techniques, both employing electrospray ionization (ESI). SOA particles were generated in a flow tube reactor with a reaction time of 23 s. A microsampling assembly in combination with ESI-FTICR analysis permitted SOA with a mass loading as low as 3.5 μg/m3 to be characterized with high accuracy and precision mass analysis. Hundreds of product molecular formulas were identified that were common to all mass loadings; however the relative intensities changed significantly. In particular, a species with the (neutral molecule) formula C17H26O8 increased substantially in intensity relative to other products as the mass loading decreased. Tandem mass spectrometry (MSn) of this species showed it to be a dimer of C9H14O4 and C8H12O4, most likely pinic acid and terpenylic acid, respectively. LCMS analysis showed different elution times for the dimer and monomer species, confirming that the dimer was not an artifact of ESI analysis. The particle number concentration increased linearly with ozone concentration (the limiting reactant in the experiment), arguing against gas phase dimerization as the rate limiting step in particle formation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0013-936X
1520-5851
DOI:10.1021/es101861k