Review, Evaluation, and Discussion of the Challenges of Missing Value Imputation for Mass Spectrometry-Based Label-Free Global Proteomics

In this review, we apply selected imputation strategies to label-free liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) proteomics datasets to evaluate the accuracy with respect to metrics of variance and classification. We evaluate several commonly used imputation approaches for individual merits and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of proteome research Vol. 14; no. 5; pp. 1993 - 2001
Main Authors Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M, Wiberg, Holli K, Matzke, Melissa M, Brown, Joseph N, Wang, Jing, McDermott, Jason E, Smith, Richard D, Rodland, Karin D, Metz, Thomas O, Pounds, Joel G, Waters, Katrina M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 01.05.2015
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this review, we apply selected imputation strategies to label-free liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) proteomics datasets to evaluate the accuracy with respect to metrics of variance and classification. We evaluate several commonly used imputation approaches for individual merits and discuss the caveats of each approach with respect to the example LC–MS proteomics data. In general, local similarity-based approaches, such as the regularized expectation maximization and least-squares adaptive algorithms, yield the best overall performances with respect to metrics of accuracy and robustness. However, no single algorithm consistently outperforms the remaining approaches, and in some cases, performing classification without imputation sometimes yielded the most accurate classification. Thus, because of the complex mechanisms of missing data in proteomics, which also vary from peptide to protein, no individual method is a single solution for imputation. On the basis of the observations in this review, the goal for imputation in the field of computational proteomics should be to develop new approaches that work generically for this data type and new strategies to guide users in the selection of the best imputation for their dataset and analysis objectives.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
AC06-76RL01830; DK071283; HHSN27220080060C; U01CA184783-01; U54-ES016015; P41-RR018522; P41-GM103493
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
ISSN:1535-3893
1535-3907
DOI:10.1021/pr501138h