Magma storage conditions and control of eruption regime in silicic volcanoes: experimental evidence from Mt. Pelée

Differences of eruption regimes in silicic volcanoes, e.g. effusive versus explosive, have commonly been ascribed either to stratification of volatiles in the magma storage region or to gas loss through permeable conduit walls. Recent Plinian and Pelean eruptions of silicic andesite magmas from Mt....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEarth and planetary science letters Vol. 156; no. 1; pp. 89 - 99
Main Authors Martel, C., Pichavant, M., Bourdier, J.-L., Traineau, H., Holtz, F., Scaillet, B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 15.03.1998
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Differences of eruption regimes in silicic volcanoes, e.g. effusive versus explosive, have commonly been ascribed either to stratification of volatiles in the magma storage region or to gas loss through permeable conduit walls. Recent Plinian and Pelean eruptions of silicic andesite magmas from Mt. Pelée (P1: 650 yr B.P., 1902, 1929) show no systematic variations in bulk rock and phenocryst and glass compositions. Rare coexisting Fe Ti oxide pairs in Pelean products yield T between 840 and 902°C, and ΔNNO between +0.4 and +0.8. Pre-eruptive melt H 2O contents, calculated from plagioclase-melt equilibria, span values from 1.9 to 5.5 wt%. Glass inclusions from the P1 Plinian fallout have H 2O contents between 4.2 and 7.1 wt%. In contrast, the Pelean inclusions have H 2O contents commonly <3 wt%, due to post-entrapment modifications upon eruption. Phase equilibrium studies allow pre-eruptive conditions to be precisely determined and demonstrate that recent eruptions, either Plinian or Pelean, tapped magmas with melt H 2O contents of 5.3–6.3 wt%, stored at 2 ± 0.5 kbar, 875–900°C and ΔNNO = +0.4-0.8. Differences in eruptive style at Mt. Pelée are unrelated to systematic variations in pre-eruptive magmatic H 2O concentrations, but may be caused by contrasting modes of degassing in the conduit.
ISSN:0012-821X
1385-013X
DOI:10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00003-X