Sorption of Fluorotelomer Sulfonates, Fluorotelomer Sulfonamido Betaines, and a Fluorotelomer Sulfonamido Amine in National Foam Aqueous Film-Forming Foam to Soil

• Published in: Environmental science & technology Vol. 51; no. 21; pp. 12394 - 12404
• Main Authors: Barzen-Hanson, Krista A., Davis, Shannon E., Kleber, Markus, Field, Jennifer A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Chemical Society 07.11.2017
• Subjects: Amines; Anion exchanging; Aqueous solutions; Betaine; Betaines; Cation exchanging; Cation-exchange capacity; Cations; Electrostatic properties; Emergency equipment; Emergency response; Fluorocarbons; Foams; Forming; Groundwater; Hydrophobicity; Organic carbon; Organic soils; Perfluoroalkyl & polyfluoroalkyl substances; Soil; Soil properties; Sorption; Sulfonates; Water Pollutants, Chemical
• ISSN: 0013-936X; 1520-5851
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03452

During fire-fighter training, equipment testing, and emergency responses with aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs), milligrams per liter concentrations of anionic, zwitterionic, and cationic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) enter the environment. Because the behavior of zwitterionic and cationic PFASs in the subsurface is unknown, batch sorption experiments were conducted using National Foam AFFF, which contains anionic fluorotelomer sulfonates (FtSs), zwitterionic fluorotelomer sulfonamido betaines (FtSaBs), and cationic 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonamido amine (FtSaAm). Sorption of the FtSs, FtSaBs, and 6:2 FtSaAm to six soils with varying organic carbon, effective cation-exchange capacity, and anion-exchange capacity was evaluated to determine sorption mechanisms. Due to the poor recovery of the FtSaBs and 6:2 FtSaAm with published PFAS soil extraction methods, a new soil extraction method was developed to achieve good (90–100%) recoveries. The 6:2 FtSaAm was depleted from the aqueous phase in all but one soil, which is attributed to electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. Sorption of the FtSs was driven by hydrophobic interactions, while the FtSaBs behave more like cations that strongly associate with the solid phase relative to groundwater. Thus, the sorption mechanisms of the FtSs, FtSaBs, and 6:2 FtSaAm are more complex than expected and cannot be predicted by bulk soil properties.