On the relationship between stress and elastic strain for porous and fractured rock

Modeling the mechanical deformations of porous and fractured rocks requires a stress–strain relationship. Experience with inherently heterogeneous earth materials suggests that different varieties of Hooke's law should be applied within regions of the rock having significantly different stress–...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997) Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 289 - 296
Main Authors Liu, Hui-Hai, Rutqvist, Jonny, Berryman, James G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Applied sciences
Buildings. Public works
Constitutive relationships
Exact sciences and technology
Geotechnics
Hooke's law
Nonlinearity
Soil mechanics. Rocks mechanics
Strength of materials (elasticity, plasticity, buckling, etc.)
Stress–strain relationship
Structural analysis. Stresses
Nonlinearity
Constitutive relationships
Hooke's law
Stress–strain relationship
Constitutive equation
Rock mechanics
Stress strain relation
Porous medium
Theoretical study
Elastic deformation
Hooke law
Confinement pressure
Jointed rock
Stress-strain relationship
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Modeling the mechanical deformations of porous and fractured rocks requires a stress–strain relationship. Experience with inherently heterogeneous earth materials suggests that different varieties of Hooke's law should be applied within regions of the rock having significantly different stress–strain behavior. We apply this idea by dividing a rock body conceptually into two distinct parts. The natural strain (volume change divided by rock volume at the current stress state), rather than the engineering strain (volume change divided by the unstressed rock volume), should be used in Hooke's law for accurate modeling of the elastic deformation of that part of the pore volume subject to a relatively large degree of relative deformation (i.e., cracks or fractures). This approach permits the derivation of constitutive relations between stress and a variety of mechanical and/or hydraulic rock properties. We show that the theoretical predictions of this method are generally consistent with empirical expressions (from field data) and also laboratory rock experimental data.
ISSN:1365-1609
1873-4545
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.04.005