Validating the Factor Structure of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale in a Community Sample

Currently, there is no standard self-report measure of psychopathy in community-dwelling samples that parallels the most commonly used measure of psychopathy in forensic and clinical samples, the Psychopathy Checklist. A promising instrument is the Self-Report Psychopathy scale (SRP), which was deri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychological assessment Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 670 - 678
Main Authors Mahmut, Mehmet K, Menictas, Con, Stevenson, Richard J, Homewood, Judi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Psychological Association 01.09.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Currently, there is no standard self-report measure of psychopathy in community-dwelling samples that parallels the most commonly used measure of psychopathy in forensic and clinical samples, the Psychopathy Checklist. A promising instrument is the Self-Report Psychopathy scale (SRP), which was derived from the original version the Psychopathy Checklist. The most recent version of the SRP (SRP-III; D. L. Paulhus, C. S. Neumann, & R. D. Hare, in press) has shown good convergent and discriminate validity and a factor structure similar to the current version of the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 1991, 2003). The analyses in the current study further investigated the viability of the SRP-III as a PCL-R-analogous measure of psychopathy in nonforensic and nonclinical samples by extending the validation process to a community sample. Using confirmatory factor analyses and logistic regressions, the results revealed that a four-factor oblique model for the SRP-III was most tenable, congruent with the PCL-R factor structure of psychopathy and previous research in which the SRP-III was administered to a student sample. (Contains 1 figure and 5 tables.)
ISSN:1040-3590
1939-134X
DOI:10.1037/a0023090