A computational account of deep dysphasia: evidence from a single case study

• Published in: Brain and language Vol. 43; no. 2; p. 240
• Main Authors: Martin, N, Saffran, E M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands 01.08.1992
• Subjects: Adult; Aphasia - complications; Aphasia - diagnosis; Aphasia - physiopathology; Brain - physiopathology; Humans; Language Disorders - diagnosis; Language Disorders - etiology; Language Tests; Male; Memory Disorders - diagnosis; Memory Disorders - etiology; Semantics; Speech Acoustics; Speech Discrimination Tests; Speech Production Measurement
• ISSN: 0093-934X
• DOI: 10.1016/0093-934X(92)90130-7

We present a case study of a patient, NC, who demonstrates the defining characteristics of deep dysphasia including semantic errors in repetition and an inability to repeat nonwords. In addition, NC's single word repetition and lexical decision performances are influenced by the imageability of the word input. NC also demonstrates a severely restricted phonological short-term memory (one digit, one word). Although his phonological discrimination is good in a minimal pairs judgment task, it becomes impaired when a delay is imposed or rehearsal is prevented between presentation of each member of a pair. NC's output is fluent but contains many formal paraphasias and neologisms. NC's total language profile is evaluated within the framework of Dell's (1986) interactive spreading activation model of language production. Adapting this output model to input processes, we account for all of NC's deep dysphasic symptoms as well as his pattern of production in a way that is more parsimonious than other attempts to model this disorder. In particular, we suggest that the semantic and formal paraphasias in naming and repetition result from a pathological increase in the rate of decay of primed nodes in the semantic-lexical-phonological network. This rapid decay increases the probability that phonologically and/or semantically related lexical nodes primed by top-down and bottom-up feedback during the operation of lexical activation and retrieval will be activated and selected instead of the lexical target. The advantages of using this model to account for aphasic symptoms and the implications for other lexical theories are discussed.