Dual continental rift systems generated by plume–lithosphere interaction

• Published in: Nature geoscience Vol. 8; no. 5; pp. 388 - 392
• Main Authors: Koptev, A., Calais, E., Burov, E., Leroy, S., Gerya, T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.05.2015; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 704/2151/210; 704/2151/213; 704/2151/562; 704/2151/598; Earth Sciences; Earth System Sciences; Geochemistry; Geology; Geophysics/Geodesy; letter; Lithosphere; Magma; Mathematical models; Rifting; Sciences of the Universe
• ISSN: 1752-0894; 1752-0908
• DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2401

Continental breakup can occur with or without extensive magmatic activity. Numerical simulations show that magmatic and amagmatic rifts can develop in the same tectonic setting, if a rising mantle plume is deflected to one side of the continent. Although many continental rifts and passive margins are magmatic, some are not 1 . This observation prompted endmember views of the mechanisms driving continental rifting, where magma-rich or active rifts would be caused by deep mantle plumes 2 , whereas magma-poor or passive rifts would result from the stretching of the lithosphere under far-field plate forces 3 . The Central East African Rift provides a unique setting to investigate the mechanisms of continental rifting because it juxtaposes a magma-rich (eastern) branch and magma-poor (western) branch on either side of the 250-km-thick Tanzanian craton 4 . Here we investigate this contrasted behavior using a high-resolution rheologically consistent three-dimensional thermo-mechanical numerical model. The model reproduces the rise of a mantle plume beneath a craton experiencing tensional far-field stress. In our numerical experiments the plume is deflected by the cratonic keel and preferentially channelled along one of its sides. This leads to the coeval development of magma-rich and magma-poor rifts along opposite craton sides, fed by melt from a single mantle source. Our numerical experiments show strong similarities to the observed evolution of the Central East African Rift, reconcile the passive and active rift models, and demonstrate the possibility of developing both magmatic and amagmatic rifts in identical geotectonic environments.