Comparative Performance of Five Commercially Available Serologic Assays To Detect Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and Identify Individuals with High Neutralizing Titers

Accurate serological assays to detect antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are needed to characterize the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and identify potential candidates for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) donation. This stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical microbiology Vol. 59; no. 2
Main Authors Patel, Eshan U., Bloch, Evan M., Clarke, William, Hsieh, Yu-Hsiang, Boon, Denali, Eby, Yolanda, Fernandez, Reinaldo E., Baker, Owen R., Keruly, Morgan, Kirby, Charles S., Klock, Ethan, Littlefield, Kirsten, Miller, Jernelle, Schmidt, Haley A., Sullivan, Philip, Piwowar-Manning, Estelle, Shrestha, Ruchee, Redd, Andrew D., Rothman, Richard E., Sullivan, David, Shoham, Shmuel, Casadevall, Arturo, Quinn, Thomas C., Pekosz, Andrew, Tobian, Aaron A. R., Laeyendecker, Oliver
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society for Microbiology 21.01.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Accurate serological assays to detect antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are needed to characterize the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and identify potential candidates for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) donation. This study compared the performances of commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) with respect to detection of IgG or total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs). The diagnostic accuracy of five commercially available EIAs (Abbott, Euroimmun, EDI, ImmunoDiagnostics, and Roche) for detection of IgG or total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated using cross-sectional samples from potential CCP donors who had prior molecular confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection ( n  = 214) and samples from prepandemic emergency department patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection ( n  = 1,099). Accurate serological assays to detect antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are needed to characterize the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and identify potential candidates for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) donation. This study compared the performances of commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) with respect to detection of IgG or total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs). The diagnostic accuracy of five commercially available EIAs (Abbott, Euroimmun, EDI, ImmunoDiagnostics, and Roche) for detection of IgG or total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated using cross-sectional samples from potential CCP donors who had prior molecular confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection ( n  = 214) and samples from prepandemic emergency department patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection ( n  = 1,099). Of the 214 potential CCP donors, all were sampled >14 days since symptom onset and only a minority ( n  = 16 [7.5%]) had been hospitalized due to COVID-19; 140 potential CCP donors were tested by all five EIAs and a microneutralization assay. Performed according to the protocols of the manufacturers to detect IgG or total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, the sensitivity of each EIA ranged from 76.4% to 93.9%, and the specificity of each EIA ranged from 87.0% to 99.6%. Using a nAb titer cutoff value of ≥160 as the reference representing a positive test result ( n  = 140 CCP donors), the empirical area under the receiver operating curve for each EIA ranged from 0.66 (Roche) to 0.90 (Euroimmun). Commercial EIAs with high diagnostic accuracy to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies did not necessarily have high diagnostic accuracy to detect high nAb titers. Some but not all commercial EIAs may be useful in the identification of individuals with high nAb titers among convalescent individuals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Aaron A. R. Tobian and Oliver Laeyendecker contributed equally to this article and are co-senior authors.
Citation Patel EU, Bloch EM, Clarke W, Hsieh Y-H, Boon D, Eby Y, Fernandez RE, Baker OR, Keruly M, Kirby CS, Klock E, Littlefield K, Miller J, Schmidt HA, Sullivan P, Piwowar-Manning E, Shrestha R, Redd AD, Rothman RE, Sullivan D, Shoham S, Casadevall A, Quinn TC, Pekosz A, Tobian AAR, Laeyendecker O. 2021. Comparative performance of five commercially available serologic assays to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and identify individuals with high neutralizing titers. J Clin Microbiol 59:e02257-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02257-20.
ISSN:0095-1137
1098-660X
1098-660X
DOI:10.1128/JCM.02257-20