Performance of the Cepheid Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/S. aureus Skin and Soft Tissue Infection PCR Assay on Respiratory Samples from Mechanically Ventilated Patients for S. aureus Screening during the Phase 2 Double-Blind SAATELLITE Study

We investigated the performance of the Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)/ S. aureus skin and soft tissue (SSTI) quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay in SAATELLITE, a multicenter, double-blind, phase 2 study of suvratoxumab, a monoclonal antibody (MAb) targeting S. aureus alpha-toxin,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical microbiology Vol. 60; no. 7; p. e0034722
Main Authors Ruzin, Alexey, Barraud, Olivier, Yu, Li, François, Bruno, Sánchez-Garcia, Miguel, Eggimann, Philippe, Dequin, Pierre-François, Laterre, Pierre-François, Huberlant, Vincent, Viña, Lucia, Boulain, Thierry, Bretonniere, Cedric, Pugin, Jérôme, Trenado, José, Hernandez Padilla, Ana Catalina, Vignaud, Julie, Vandamme, Drieke, Goossens, Herman, Lammens, Christine, Ali, S. Omar, Shoemaker, Kathryn, Ren, Pin, Colbert, Susan, Bellamy, Terramika, Sellman, Bret R., McCarthy, Michael, Jafri, Hasan S., Esser, Mark T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society for Microbiology 20.07.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We investigated the performance of the Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)/ S. aureus skin and soft tissue (SSTI) quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay in SAATELLITE, a multicenter, double-blind, phase 2 study of suvratoxumab, a monoclonal antibody (MAb) targeting S. aureus alpha-toxin, for reducing the incidence of S. aureus pneumonia. We investigated the performance of the Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)/ S. aureus skin and soft tissue (SSTI) quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay in SAATELLITE, a multicenter, double-blind, phase 2 study of suvratoxumab, a monoclonal antibody (MAb) targeting S. aureus alpha-toxin, for reducing the incidence of S. aureus pneumonia. The assay was used to detect methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA in lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples from mechanically ventilated patients. LRT culture results were compared with S. aureus protein A ( spa ) gene cycle threshold ( C T ) values. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Youden index were used to determine the C T cutoff for best separation of culture- S. aureus -negative and S. aureus -positive patients. Of 720 screened subjects, 299 (41.5%) were S. aureus positive by qPCR, of whom 209 had culture data: 162 (77.5%) were S. aureus positive and 47 (22.5%) were S. aureus negative. Culture results were negatively affected by antibiotic use and cross-laboratory variability. An inverse linear correlation was observed between C T values and quantitative S. aureus culture results. A spa C T value of 29 (≈2 × 10 3 CFU/mL) served as the best cutoff for separation between culture-negative and culture-positive samples. The associated area under the ROC curve was 83.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78 to 90%). Suvratoxumab provided greater reduction in S. aureus pneumonia or death than placebo in subjects with low S. aureus load ( C T  ≥ 29; relative risk reduction [RRR], 50.0%; 90% CI, 2.7 to 74.4%) versus the total study population (RRR, 25.2%; 90% CI, −4.3 to 46.4%). The qPCR assay was easy to perform, sensitive, and standardized and provided better sensitivity than conventional culture for S. aureus detection. Quantitative PCR C T output correlated with suvratoxumab efficacy in reducing S. aureus pneumonia incidence or death in S. aureus -colonized, mechanically ventilated patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Present address: Li Yu, AveXis, La Jolla, California, USA.
Present address: Drieke Vandamme, Aridis Pharmaceuticals, Los Gatos, California, USA.
Alexey Ruzin and Olivier Barraud contributed equally to this article. The order was determined by the corresponding author after negotiation.
The authors declare a conflict of interest. A.R., L.Y., S.O.A., K.S., P.R., S.C., T. Bellamy, B.R.S., M.M., H.S.J., and M.T.E. are or were employees of AstraZeneca at the time of this study, with stock ownership and/or stock options or interests in the company. B.F. reports personal fees (expert panel, consultancy, steering, and/or advisory board or committee) outside the submitted work from bioMérieux, Aridis, Ashai-Kasai, Polyphor, AM-Pharma, Ferring, Inotrem, Transgene, and Enlivex. D.V. reports grants from IMI. J.T. reports grants from AstraZeneca. O.B. reports nonfinancial and personal fees from MSD France, Roche Diagnostics France, Sanofi Aventis France, bioMérieux, Correvio, Viatris, and Pfizer. P.-F.D. reports institutional funding and/or grants from Abionic, Acombioxin, Adrenomed, Aridis, AtoxBio, Combioxin, Faron, Genentech, GSK, Kenta, MedSpace, Merck, RevImmune, Sphingotec, and Tigenix. A.C.H.P., C.B., C.L., H.G., J.P., J.V., L.V., M.S.-G., P.E., P.-F.L., T. Boulain, and V.H. have nothing to disclose.
Present address: Hasan S. Jafri, Aridis Pharmaceuticals, Los Gatos, California, USA.
Present address: S. Omar Ali, Viela Bio, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Present address: Susan Colbert, Aridis Pharmaceuticals, Los Gatos, California, USA.
Present address: Terramika Bellamy, Aridis Pharmaceuticals, Los Gatos, California, USA.
ISSN:0095-1137
1098-660X
1098-660X
DOI:10.1128/jcm.00347-22