Light Induces Destabilization of Photoactive Yellow Protein

To understand the effect of visible light on the stability of photoactive yellow protein (PYP), urea denaturation experiments were performed with PYP in the dark and with PYPM under continuous illumination. The urea concentrations at the midpoint of denaturation were 5.26 ± 0.29 and 3.77 ± 0.19 M fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiochemistry (Easton) Vol. 40; no. 9; pp. 2854 - 2859
Main Authors Ohishi, Shin'ichi, Shimizu, Nobutaka, Mihara, Ken'ichi, Imamoto, Yasushi, Kataoka, Mikio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 06.03.2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To understand the effect of visible light on the stability of photoactive yellow protein (PYP), urea denaturation experiments were performed with PYP in the dark and with PYPM under continuous illumination. The urea concentrations at the midpoint of denaturation were 5.26 ± 0.29 and 3.77 ± 0.19 M for PYP and PYPM, respectively, in 100 mM acetate buffer, and 5.26 ± 0.24 and 4.11 ± 0.12 M for PYP and PYPM, respectively, in 100 mM citrate buffer. The free energy change upon denaturation (ΔG D H 2 O), obtained from the denaturation curve, was 11.0 ± 0.4 and 7.6 ± 0.2 kcal/mol for PYP and PYPM, respectively, in acetate buffer, and 11.5 ± 0.3 and 7.8 ± 0.1 kcal/mol for PYP and PYPM, respectively, in citrate buffer. Even though the ΔG D H 2 O value for PYPM is almost identical in the two buffer systems, the urea concentration at the midpoint of denaturation is lower in acetate buffer than in citrate buffer. Although their CD spectra indicate that the protein conformations of the denatured states of PYP and PYPM are indistinguishable, the configurations of the chromophores in their denatured structures are not necessarily identical. Both denatured states are interconvertible through PYP and PYPM. Therefore, the free energy difference between PYP and PYPM is 3.4−3.7 kcal/mol for the protein moiety, plus the additional contribution from the difference in configuration of the chromophore.
Bibliography:istex:709411BC97E4C3C89E89E3F4415037F3D194BB41
ark:/67375/TPS-J3L03D1J-C
This work was partly supported by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan to M.K.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0006-2960
1520-4995
DOI:10.1021/bi001846i