Using CFD Modeling to Improve the Inlet Hydraulics and Performance of a Storm-Water Clarifier

• Published in: Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 134; no. 9; pp. 722 - 730
• Main Authors: He, Cheng, Wood, Jim, Marsalek, Jiri, Rochfort, Quintin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Reston, VA American Society of Civil Engineers 01.09.2008
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Exact sciences and technology; Pollution; TECHNICAL PAPERS; Storm; Water treatment; Computational fluid dynamics; Plugging; Hydrodynamics; Cleaning; Three-dimensional flow; Flow pattern; Hydrodynamics; Numerical models; Stormwater management; Inlets; Maintenance; Flow field; Modeling; Design; Storage; Loading; waterways; Suspended solids; Numerical simulation; Storm water
• ISSN: 0733-9372; 1943-7870
• DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:9(722)

The feasibility of high-rate treatment of storm water achieving total suspended solids (TSS) removals in the range from 60 to 80% was studied using an available clarifier. The clarifier ( 3 m long, 1.4 m wide, and 2 m deep) was fitted with a removable lamella pack and had a limited flow capacity (surface load rate of 35 m∕h ). To achieve the desired removals of TSS, the clarifier required polymer feed (4 mg∕L) , which caused maintenance problems during intermittent storm-water treatment—laborious and costly cleaning of lamella plates after individual storm events. This problem posed the following challenge: was it feasible to avoid costly maintenance by removing the lamella pack and at the same time to retain the high TSS removals by improving the clarifier hydraulics by internal structural changes? The purpose of the paper is to evaluate such changes by focusing on different inlet configurations designed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. This analysis resulted in adopting a U-tube duct inlet (inserted into the outer box of the original clarifier) with two special features: (1) three horizontal slot openings (width=0.1 m) releasing flow into the clarifier and (2) a narrow slot opening in the bottom U bend allowing removal of grit. The flow release slots in the rising leg of the U tube were fitted, along the upper edge, with horizontal trailing plates protruding 0.15 m into the clarifier and forcing the flow to move horizontally. This clarifier design performed well, but storm-water grit accumulated at the bottom of the U tube, which had to be cleaned out after individual storms to avoid plugging. This issue was resolved by allowing grit to move into the sludge storage compartment of the clarifier through a narrow tilted slot opening in the U-tube bottom. The final clarifier design with polymer feed, without lamellas, produced TSS removals comparable to those in the original lamella clarifier (almost 80%), but at a higher surface loading rate ( 43 m∕h , which was limited by the feed pump capacity). CFD modeling, in comparison to conventional methods of hydraulic design, served as a flexible and powerful tool providing distinct advantages with respect to the speed, efficiency and reduced cost of analysis, and a better understanding of the clarifier operation.