Phylogeography and biogeography of the lower Central American Neotropics: diversification between two continents and between two seas

ABSTRACT Lower Central America (LCA) provides a geologically complex and dynamic, richly biodiverse model for studying the recent assembly and diversification of a Neotropical biota. Here, we review the growing literature of LCA phylogeography studies and their contribution to understanding the orig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society Vol. 89; no. 4; pp. 767 - 790
Main Authors Bagley, Justin C., Johnson, Jerald B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Lower Central America (LCA) provides a geologically complex and dynamic, richly biodiverse model for studying the recent assembly and diversification of a Neotropical biota. Here, we review the growing literature of LCA phylogeography studies and their contribution to understanding the origins, assembly, and diversification of the LCA biota against the backdrop of regional geologic and climatic history, and previous biogeographical inquiry. Studies to date reveal that phylogeographical signal within taxa of differing distributions reflects a diversity of patterns and processes rivalling the complexities of LCA landscapes themselves. Even so, phylogeography is providing novel insights into regional diversification (e.g. cryptic lineage divergences), and general evolutionary patterns are emerging. Congruent multi‐taxon phylogeographic breaks are found across the Nicaraguan depression, Chorotega volcanic front, western and central Panama, and the Darién isthmus, indicating that a potentially shared history of responses to regional‐scale (e.g. geological) processes has shaped the genetic diversity of LCA communities. By contrast, other species show unique demographic histories in response to overriding historical events, including no phylogeographic structure at all. These low‐structure or incongruent patterns provide some evidence for a role of local, ecological factors (e.g. long‐distance dispersal and gene flow in plants and bats) in shaping LCA communities. Temporally, comparative phylogeographical structuring reflects Pliocene–Pleistocene dispersal and vicariance events consistent with the timeline of emergence of the LCA isthmus and its major physiographic features, e.g. cordilleras. We emphasise the need to improve biogeographic inferences in LCA through in‐depth comparative phylogeography projects capitalising on the latest statistical phylogeographical methods. While meeting the challenges of reconstructing the biogeographical history of this complex region, phylogeographers should also take up the critical service to society of applying their work to the conservation of its fascinating biodiversity.
Bibliography:BYU Mentoring Environment Grant
Brigham Young University (BYU) Department of Biology
ark:/67375/WNG-J4RXKC4C-N
Idea Wild
NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant - No. DEB-1210883
istex:D9258FB6E95840B8B6406E211358374161B41506
ArticleID:BRV12076
BYU Graduate Studies
Table S1. Summary of patterns emerging from lower Central American (LCA) phylogeography studies (N = 58), including phylogeographical breaks.Table S2. Summary of molecular dating methods and divergence dates for major lineages recovered in lower Central American phylogeography studies.Table S3. Summary of species contributions to phylogeographic breaks recovered in LCA.Appendix S1. Materials and methods.Appendix S2. Literature search results.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ISSN:1464-7931
1469-185X
DOI:10.1111/brv.12076