Recruitment facilitation and spatial pattern formation in soft-bottom mussel beds

Mussels ( Mytilus edulis ) build massive, spatially complex, biogenic structures that alter the biotic and abiotic environment and provide a variety of ecosystem services. Unlike rocky shores, where mussels can attach to the primary substrate, soft sediments are unsuitable for mussel attachment. We...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEcosphere (Washington, D.C) Vol. 5; no. 12; pp. art160 - 26
Main Authors Commito, John A, Commito, Ann E, Platt, Rutherford V, Grupe, Benjamin M, Piniak, Wendy E. Dow, Gownaris, Natasha J, Reeves, Kyle A, Vissichelli, Allison M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Ecological Society of America 01.12.2014
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Mussels ( Mytilus edulis ) build massive, spatially complex, biogenic structures that alter the biotic and abiotic environment and provide a variety of ecosystem services. Unlike rocky shores, where mussels can attach to the primary substrate, soft sediments are unsuitable for mussel attachment. We used a simple lattice model, field sampling, and field and laboratory experiments to examine facilitation of recruitment (i.e., preferential larval, juvenile, and adult attachment to mussel biogenic structure) and its role in the development of power-law spatial patterns observed in Maine, USA, soft-bottom mussel beds. The model demonstrated that recruitment facilitation produces power-law spatial structure similar to that in natural beds. Field results provided strong evidence for facilitation of recruitment to other mussels-they do not simply map onto a hard-substrate template of gravel and shell hash. Mussels were spatially decoupled from non-mussel hard substrates to which they can potentially recruit. Recent larval recruits were positively correlated with adult mussels, but not with other hard substrates. Mussels made byssal thread attachments to other mussels in much higher proportions than to other hard substrates. In a field experiment, mussel recruitment was highest to live mussels, followed by mussel shell hash and gravel, with almost no recruitment to muddy sand. In a laboratory experiment, evenly dispersed mussels rapidly self-organized into power-law clusters similar to those observed in nature. Collectively, the results indicate that facilitation of recruitment to existing mussels plays a major role in soft-bottom spatial pattern development. The interaction between large-scale resource availability (hard substrate) and local-scale recruitment facilitation may be responsible for creating complex power-law spatial structure in soft-bottom mussel beds.
Bibliography:Present address: Cashman Dredging & Marine Contracting Co., LLC, 549 South Street Quincy, Massachusetts 02269 USA.
Present address: Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla, California 92093 USA.
Present address: Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 USA.
Present address: Institute for Ocean Conservation Science, School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicholls Road, Stony Brook, New York 11794‐5000 USA.
Present address: American University Washington College of Law, 4801 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20016 USA.
Corresponding Editor: D. P. C. Peters.
ISSN:2150-8925
2150-8925
DOI:10.1890/ES14-00200.1