Effects of Acoustic Emission and Energy Evolution of Rock Specimens Under the Uniaxial Cyclic Loading and Unloading Compression

• Published in: Rock mechanics and rock engineering Vol. 49; no. 10; pp. 3873 - 3886
• Main Authors: Meng, Qingbin, Zhang, Mingwei, Han, Lijun, Pu, Hai, Nie, Taoyi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Vienna Springer Vienna 01.10.2016; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Acoustic emission; Axial stress; Civil Engineering; Compressing; Dissipation; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Energy dissipation; Energy storage; Evolution; Fatigue (materials); Fracture mechanics; Geophysics/Geodesy; Load; Load distribution; Original Paper; Peak load; Rock; Rock deformation; Rocks; Sandstone; Strain; Stress-strain curves; Stresses; Uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading compression; Acoustic emission; Energy evolution; Energy density; Rock deformation and failure
• ISSN: 0723-2632; 1434-453X
• DOI: 10.1007/s00603-016-1077-y

Characteristics of energy accumulation, evolution, and dissipation in uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading compression of 30 sandstone rock specimens under six different loading rates were explored. Stress–strain relations and acoustic emission characteristics of the deformation and failure of rock specimens were analyzed. The densities and rates of stored energy, elastic energy, and dissipated energy under different loading rates were confirmed, and an effective approach for the equivalent energy surface was presented. The energy evolution of rock deformation and failure were revealed. It turns out that the rock deformation behavior under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading compression remained almost unchanged compared with that of uniaxial compression. The degree of match between reloading stress–strain curves and previous unloading curves was high, thereby demonstrating the memory function of rock masses. The intensity of acoustic emission fluctuated continually during the entire cyclic process. Emissions significantly increased as the stress exceeded the unloading level. The peak of acoustic emission increased with increasing loading stress level. Relationships between energy density and axial load indicate that the rock mass possesses a certain energy storage limitation. The energy evolution of rock masses is closely related to the axial loading stress, rather than to the axial loading rate. With increasing axial loading stress, stored energy varied most rapidly, followed by that of the elastic energy, then dissipated energy. Energy accumulation dominates prior to the axial load reaching peak strength; thereafter, energy dissipation becomes dominant. The input energy causes the irreversible initiation and extension of microcracks in the rock body. Elastic energy release leads to sudden instability of rock bodies and drives rock damage.