Conditioned [corrected] stimulus informativeness governs conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus associability

• Published in: Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes Vol. 38; no. 3; p. 217
• Main Authors: Ward, Ryan D, Gallistel, C R, Jensen, Greg, Richards, Vanessa L, Fairhurst, Stephen, Balsam, Peter D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.07.2012
• Subjects: Acoustic Stimulation; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Association Learning - physiology; Behavior, Animal; Conditioning, Classical - physiology; Conditioning, Operant - physiology; Light; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Reinforcement (Psychology); Time Factors
• ISSN: 1939-2184
• DOI: 10.1037/a0027621

In a conditioning protocol, the onset of the conditioned stimulus ([CS]) provides information about when to expect reinforcement (unconditioned stimulus [US]). There are two sources of information from the CS in a delay conditioning paradigm in which the CS-US interval is fixed. The first depends on the informativeness, the degree to which CS onset reduces the average expected time to onset of the next US. The second depends only on how precisely a subject can represent a fixed-duration interval (the temporal Weber fraction). In three experiments with mice, we tested the differential impact of these two sources of information on rate of acquisition of conditioned responding (CS-US associability). In Experiment 1, we showed that associability (the inverse of trials to acquisition) increased in proportion to informativeness. In Experiment 2, we showed that fixing the duration of the US-US interval or the CS-US interval or both had no effect on associability. In Experiment 3, we equated the increase in information produced by varying the C/T ratio with the increase produced by fixing the duration of the CS-US interval. Associability increased with increased informativeness, but, as in Experiment 2, fixing the CS-US duration had no effect on associability. These results are consistent with the view that CS-US associability depends on the increased rate of reward signaled by CS onset. The results also provide further evidence that conditioned responding is temporally controlled when it emerges.