Uncertainty in the Multielemental Quantification by Total-Reflection X-ray Fluorescence: Theoretical and Empirical Approximation

Nowadays, the subject of the quality assurance of the analytical results is acquiring more and more importance. This work presents a basic theoretical and empirical approximation to the expanded uncertainty associated to the TXRF measurements. Two theoretical models has been proposed and compared sy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnalytical chemistry (Washington) Vol. 80; no. 22; pp. 8372 - 8381
Main Author Fernández-Ruiz, R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Chemical Society 15.11.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-2700
1520-6882
1520-6882
DOI10.1021/ac800780x

Cover

More Information
Summary:Nowadays, the subject of the quality assurance of the analytical results is acquiring more and more importance. This work presents a basic theoretical and empirical approximation to the expanded uncertainty associated to the TXRF measurements. Two theoretical models has been proposed and compared systematically with the empirical expanded uncertainty obtained. The main consequences derived of this work are the following; theoretical model B explains with a high degree of agreement the empirical expanded uncertainties associated to the TXRF measurements, while theoretical model A explains partially the instrumental repeatability of the TXRF system. On the other hand, an unexpected U-behavior has been found for the empirical uncertainty in TXRF measurements whose explanation can be due to the sum of several sources of uncertainty not considered like variations of the Compton background or the nonlinearity of the Si(Li) detector quantum efficiency. Additionally, it has been shown that the roughness and small geometrical variations of the sample depositions are the more important uncertainty sources in the experimental TXRF measurements.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/TPS-HF5BHPJG-G
istex:CDEEAA616BEA61E9F6A5C7D3E95F8DC24EC62837
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-2700
1520-6882
1520-6882
DOI:10.1021/ac800780x