Comparing P and S wave heterogeneity in the mantle

From the reprocessed data set of Engdahl and co‐workers we have carefully selected matching P and S data for tomographic imaging. We assess data and model error and conclude that our S model uncertainty is twice that of the P model. We account for this in our comparison of the perturbations in P and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeophysical research letters Vol. 28; no. 7; pp. 1335 - 1338
Main Authors Saltzer, R. L., Hilst, R. D., Kárason, H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2001
American Geophysical Union
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:From the reprocessed data set of Engdahl and co‐workers we have carefully selected matching P and S data for tomographic imaging. We assess data and model error and conclude that our S model uncertainty is twice that of the P model. We account for this in our comparison of the perturbations in P and S‐wavespeed. In accord with previous studies we find that P and S perturbations are positively correlated at all depths. However, in the deep mantle systematic differences occur between regions that have undergone subduction in the last 120 million years and those that have not. In particular, below 1500 km depth ∂ln Vs/∂ln Vp is significantly larger in mantle regions away from subduction than in mantle beneath convergent margins. This inference is substantiated by wavespeed analyses with random realizations of the slab/non‐slab distribution. Through much of the mantle there is no significant correlation between bulk sound and S‐wave perturbations, but they appear to be negatively correlated between 1700 and 2100 km depth, which is also where the largest differences in ∂ln Vs/∂ln Vp occur. This finding supports convection models with compositional heterogeneity in the lowermost mantle.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-TJX8VV7R-0
ArticleID:2000GL012339
istex:6483869B677F19190BD7146458D85AA850EC2E04
ISSN:0094-8276
1944-8007
DOI:10.1029/2000GL012339