Performance of TD-DFT for Excited States of Open-Shell Transition Metal Compounds
Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) has been very successful in accessing low-lying excited states of closed-shell systems. However, it is much less so for excited states of open-shell systems: unrestricted Kohn–Sham based TD-DFT (U-TD-DFT) often produces physically meaningless excited...
Saved in:
Published in | The journal of physical chemistry. A, Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory Vol. 121; no. 20; pp. 3929 - 3942 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Chemical Society
25.05.2017
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) has been very successful in accessing low-lying excited states of closed-shell systems. However, it is much less so for excited states of open-shell systems: unrestricted Kohn–Sham based TD-DFT (U-TD-DFT) often produces physically meaningless excited states due to heavy spin contaminations, whereas restricted Kohn–Sham based TD-DFT often misses those states of lower energies. A much better variant is the explicitly spin-adapted TD-DFT (X-TD-DFT) [J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135, 194106] that can capture all the spin-adapted singly excited states yet without computational overhead over U-TD-DFT. While the superiority of X-TD-DFT over U-TD-DFT has been demonstrated for open-shell systems of main group elements, it remains to be seen if this is also the case for open-shell transition metal compounds. Taking as benchmark the results by MS-CASPT2 (multistate complete active space second-order perturbation theory) and ic-MRCISD (internally contracted multireference configuration interaction with singles and doubles), it is shown that X-TD-DFT is indeed superior to U-TD-DFT for the vertical excitation energies of ZnH, CdH, ScH2, YH2, YO, and NbO2. Admittedly, there exist a few cases where U-TD-DFT appears to be better than X-TD-DFT. However, this is due to a wrong reason: the underestimation (due to spin contamination) and the overestimation (due to either the exchange-correlation functional itself or the adiabatic approximation to the exchange-correlation kernel) happen to be compensated in the case of U-TD-DFT. As for [Cu(C6H6)2]2+, which goes beyond the capability of both MS-CASPT2 and ic-MRCISD, X-TD-DFT revises the U-TD-DFT assignment of the experimental spectrum. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1089-5639 1520-5215 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b00752 |