A New Method for Navigating Optimal Direction for Pulling Ligand from Binding Pocket: Application to Ranking Binding Affinity by Steered Molecular Dynamics

In this paper we present a new method for finding the optimal path for pulling a ligand from the binding pocket using steered molecular dynamics (SMD). Scoring function is defined as the steric hindrance caused by a receptor to ligand movement. Then the optimal path corresponds to the minimum of thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of chemical information and modeling Vol. 55; no. 12; pp. 2731 - 2738
Main Authors Vuong, Quan Van, Nguyen, Tin Trung, Li, Mai Suan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 28.12.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this paper we present a new method for finding the optimal path for pulling a ligand from the binding pocket using steered molecular dynamics (SMD). Scoring function is defined as the steric hindrance caused by a receptor to ligand movement. Then the optimal path corresponds to the minimum of this scoring function. We call the new method MSH (Minimal Steric Hindrance). Contrary to existing navigation methods, our approach takes into account the geometry of the ligand while other methods including CAVER only consider the ligand as a sphere with a given radius. Using three different target + receptor sets, we have shown that the rupture force F max and nonequilibrium work W pull obtained based on the MSH method show a much higher correlation with experimental data on binding free energies compared to CAVER. Furthermore, W pull was found to be a better indicator for binding affinity than F max. Thus, the new MSH method is a reliable tool for obtaining the best direction for ligand exiting from the binding site. Its combination with the standard SMD technique can provide reasonable results for ranking binding affinities using W pull as a scoring function.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1549-9596
1549-960X
DOI:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00386