Experimental Investigation of Physical Leaky Barrier Design Implications on Juvenile Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Movement

Rivers have been subject to the construction of numerous small‐scale anthropogenic structures, causing the alteration and fragmentation of habitats. Despite their impact on fish habitat selection, migration, and swimming performance, more hydraulic structures are being added to riverine systems. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWater resources research Vol. 57; no. 8
Main Authors Müller, Stephanie, Wilson, Catherine A. M. E., Ouro, Pablo, Cable, Joanne
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.08.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Rivers have been subject to the construction of numerous small‐scale anthropogenic structures, causing the alteration and fragmentation of habitats. Despite their impact on fish habitat selection, migration, and swimming performance, more hydraulic structures are being added to riverine systems. These mainly have the purpose of harnessing renewable energy or mitigating the impact of flooding, as in the case of leaky barriers that are widely used for natural flood management. By providing a sustainable and cost‐effective supplement to traditional hard engineering flood risk management methods, these channel‐spanning wooden barriers are constructed using sustainable, local materials, intended to slow down surface water and groundwater flow, reduce flood peaks, and attenuate the flow reaching downstream communities. Despite their increasing popularity, little is known about the design implications on fish movement or hydrodynamics. Using scaled laboratory flume experiments we investigate how the physical design of four leaky barriers varying in porosity, length, provision of overhead cover, and color, impact on fish movement and spatial usage, and the channel hydrodynamics. Our fish behavioral analysis reveals that juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) movement reduces with barrier presence. Upstream passage increases with barrier color but not cover, for shorter rather than longer leaky barriers, and for a non‐porous barrier compared to its porous counterpart. Barrier‐specific flow alterations appear to play a secondary role compared to barrier color. Our study showed that physical barrier design and leaky barrier presence alter fish movement, and therefore care needs to be taken during the design of such natural flood management structures. Key Points Four leaky barrier designs varying in porosity, longitudinal length, and color were tested in an experimental flume Color and complexity of barrier design impacted fish spatial usage and upstream passage A short leaky barrier had least impact on upstream passage
ISSN:0043-1397
1944-7973
DOI:10.1029/2021WR030111