Integrated Interpretation of Interwell Connectivity Using Injection and Production Fluctuations
A method to characterize reservoirs, based on matching temporal fluctuations in injection and production rates, has recently been developed. The method produces two coefficients for each injector–producer pair; one parameter, λ , quantifies the connectivity and the other, τ , quantifies the fluid st...
Saved in:
Published in | Mathematical geosciences Vol. 41; no. 1; pp. 81 - 102 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer-Verlag
2009
Springer Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A method to characterize reservoirs, based on matching temporal fluctuations in injection and production rates, has recently been developed. The method produces two coefficients for each injector–producer pair; one parameter,
λ
, quantifies the connectivity and the other,
τ
, quantifies the fluid storage in the vicinity of the pair. Previous analyses used
λ
and
τ
separately to infer the presence of transmissibility barriers and conduits in the reservoir, but several common conditions could not be easily distinguished. This paper describes how
λ
and
τ
can be jointly interpreted to enhance inference about preferential transmissibility trends and barriers. Two different combinations are useful: one is a plot of log (
λ
) versus log (
τ
) for a producer and nearby injectors, and the second is a Lorenz-style flow capacity (
F
) versus storativity (
C
) plot. These techniques were tested against the results of a numerical simulator and applied to data from the North Buck Draw field. Using the simulated data, we find that the
F
–
C
plots and the
λ
–
τ
plots are capable of identifying whether the connectivity of an injector–producer well pair is through fractures, a high-permeability layer, multiple-layers or through partially completed wells. Analysis of data from the North Buck Draw field shows a reasonable correspondence between
τ
and the tracer breakthrough times. Of two possible geological models for Buck Draw, the
F
–
C
and
λ
–
τ
plots support the model that has less connectivity in the field. The wells in fluvial deposits show better communication than those wells in more estuarine-dominated regions. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1874-8961 1874-8953 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11004-008-9189-x |