Using aerated gravel-packed contact bed and constructed wetland system for polluted river water purification: A case study in Taiwan

• Published in: Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) Vol. 525; pp. 400 - 408
• Main Authors: Lin, J.L., Tu, Y.T., Chiang, P.C., Chen, S.H., Kao, C.M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.06.2015
• Subjects: Aerated gravel-packed contact bed; Constructed wetland; Construction; Contact; Plants (organisms); River pollution; Sediments; Streams; Water purification; Water quality; Wetland hydrology; Wetlands; Wildlife conservation; ISEW, Taiwan; Taiwan, Kaohsiung; River pollution; Wetland hydrology; Aerated gravel-packed contact bed; Constructed wetland; Water quality
• ISSN: 0022-1694; 1879-2707
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.049

•A wetland and gravel-packed contact bed scheme was developed for stream water restoration.•The novel semi-natural system can remove organics, coliforms, and nutrients effectively.•The combined scheme can be developed into a river water quality improvement alternative.•Increased wetland biodiversity revealed the system had a positive impact on the ecosystem.•The specially designed scheme became a multi-function system for ecosystem restoration. The Ju-Liao Stream is one of the most contaminated streams in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. A constructed wetland (CW) system was built in 2010 for polluted stream water purification and ecosystem improvement. An aerated gravel-packed contact bed (CB) system was built in 2011 and part of the stream water was treated by the CB before discharging to the CW. The influent rates of the CW and CB were approximately 5570 and 900m3/d, respectively. The CW contained one free-water surface basin planted with emergent wetland plants, followed by the plug-flow channel-shaped free-water surface basin planted with emergent and floating wetland plants. The mean measured hydraulic loading rate (HLR), hydraulic retention time (HRT), water depth, and total volume of wetland system were 1.7m/d, 0.68d, 0.7m, and 4400m3, respectively. The aeration zone of the CB system had a dimension of 24m (L)×8m (W)×3m (H), which was filled with gravels (average diameter=5cm) with a porosity of 0.4, and the aeration rate was 7.8m3/min. Results show that the CB system was able to remove 69% of suspended solid (SS), 86% of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and 58% of total nitrogen (TN). Up to 82% of BOD and 27% of TN could be removed in the CW system. Removal efficiency of SS was affected by the growth of chlorophyll a in the CW system due to the growth of algae. The observed first-order decay rates (k) for BOD and TN in CB were 9.3 and 4.21/d, and the k values for BOD and TN removal in CW were 2.5 and 0.451/d. The high pollutant removal efficiencies in the CB system indicate that the system could enhance the organic and nutrient removal through the biological processes effectively. Sediments contained high total organic matter (1.9–4.5%), sediment total nitrogen (6.4–10.1g/kg), sediment total phosphorus (0.59–0.94g/kg), and sediment oxygen demand (0.9–4.1g O2/m2d). The organic and nutrient-abundant sediments resulted in reduced conditions (oxidation–reduction potential measurements <158mV). Increased evenness, richness, and biodiversity for birds and amphibious animals reveal that the CW had a positive impact on the ecosystem conservation and wildlife habitat rehabilitation.