A New Method to Assess Coal Burst Risks Using Dynamic and Static Loading Analysis

Mining-induced seismicity is one of the dynamic energy sources that can trigger coal burst. This paper presents a new methodology to assess coal burst risks under different loading conditions by examining seismic energy attenuation and fracture size. Two new indices are proposed: (1) Dynamic Load In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRock mechanics and rock engineering Vol. 53; no. 3; pp. 1113 - 1128
Main Authors Wang, Changbin, Cao, Anye, Zhang, Chengguo, Canbulat, Ismet
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Vienna Springer Vienna 01.03.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Mining-induced seismicity is one of the dynamic energy sources that can trigger coal burst. This paper presents a new methodology to assess coal burst risks under different loading conditions by examining seismic energy attenuation and fracture size. Two new indices are proposed: (1) Dynamic Load Index (DLI) quantifies the magnitude of dynamic loading induced by seismic events, based on the relationships between the seismic energy, peak particle velocity and dynamic stress; (2) dynamic–static loading assessment index, I PD , links the DLI with passive velocity tomography (PVT) to assess the coal burst risks in a longwall panel under dynamic and static loading. A total of 3080 seismic records were examined to validate I PD in a typical burst-prone longwall panel in China. Based on the rate of occurrence of high-magnitude seismic events, I PD thresholds were determined to identify low-, medium- and high-risk coal burst zones. Using this new zoning approach, coal burst risks were assessed in the same longwall panel while mining through a fault structure. The proposed risk classes correlated well with the recorded high-magnitude seismic events with energies over 10 kJ. The analysis indicated that 69% of the high-magnitude events occurred in the high-risk zones, where I PD was between 0.35 and 1; and 31% of the events occurred in the medium-risk zones, where I PD was between 0.2 and 0.35.
ISSN:0723-2632
1434-453X
DOI:10.1007/s00603-019-01968-5