A large-scale statistical analysis of barefoot impressions

In an earlier paper, outlines of footprints of persons walking normally were studied to determine whether different people make verifiably distinct footprints. Our basic null hypothesis is: given a footprint outline trace made by Subject A (Alice), then Subject B (Bob), a distinct person, cannot pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of forensic sciences Vol. 50; no. 5; p. 1071
Main Authors Kennedy, Robert B, Chen, Sanping, Pressman, Irwin S, Yamashita, A Brian, Pressman, Ari E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.09.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In an earlier paper, outlines of footprints of persons walking normally were studied to determine whether different people make verifiably distinct footprints. Our basic null hypothesis is: given a footprint outline trace made by Subject A (Alice), then Subject B (Bob), a distinct person, cannot produce a footprint outline trace indistinguishable from that of Alice. We showed in the previous work that the probability of a chance match is less than 10(-8). In this paper we report two new advances in our research. First, we establish a rigorous mathematical framework for calculating worstcase and average chance-match probabilities. Second, we repeat the previous experiment to substantiate the earlier results, but with an expanded population sample size and a more representative and significantly bigger repeated sample. These improvements and a new automated tracing procedure for extracting all numerical measures lead to a sharpened accuracy with average chance match probabilities of 7.88 x 10-(10) for a general population. In other words, the odds of a chance match are one in 1.27 billion.
ISSN:0022-1198
DOI:10.1520/JFS2004277