Effects of spatial variation of soil properties on seismic performance of port structures

From past seismic events such as the 1995 Kobe (Hyogoken-Nanbu) and 2001 Nisqually earthquakes, it was found that liquefaction-induced lateral spread has caused significant damage to structures such as buildings and bridges, in addition to underground utility facilities like pipelines. In this respe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSoil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 537 - 545
Main Authors Na, Ung Jin, Ray Chaudhuri, Samit, Shinozuka, Masanobu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:From past seismic events such as the 1995 Kobe (Hyogoken-Nanbu) and 2001 Nisqually earthquakes, it was found that liquefaction-induced lateral spread has caused significant damage to structures such as buildings and bridges, in addition to underground utility facilities like pipelines. In this respect, seaport facilities are particularly vulnerable to these liquefaction-related damages, because they are usually constructed on poorly consolidated natural deposit or fills. This study investigates the effect of the liquefaction and lateral spread on the seismic response of caisson type quay walls. For this purpose, 2D nonlinear dynamic analyses of soil–structure system are carried out with the aid of finite difference software, FLAC. The unique feature of this study lies in the fact that the 2D soil system is idealized as homogeneous non-Gaussian random field. A simulation algorithm is then used to generate a set of digital realizations of 2D random field sample. Each realization is used for the dynamic analysis to generate a unique response of the soil–structure system. Repeating this analysis for the entire set of realizations, the probabilistic nature of the response is characterized in the Monte Carlo sense. This result based on random field is compared with the response obtained under the uniform field assumption with the mean value of soil property. The comparison shows that in general the uniform model provides unconservative result compared with the response from the random field model due to nonlinear behavior of the soil–structure system. It is also found that the consideration of spatial variation of soil can capture the dispersion of observed response of quay walls.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0267-7261
1879-341X
DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.06.002