Relationships between fracture patterns, geodynamics and mechanical stratigraphy in Carbonates (South-East Basin, France)

This study aims at improving the understanding of fracture genesis in layered carbonate sedimentary sequences, focusing on field analysis of Jurassic to Maastrichtian age carbonates of Provence (France). Fracture patterns of 9 outcrops were characterized in 3D: 6 of Urgonian, 1 of Tithonian and 2 of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTectonophysics Vol. 581; pp. 231 - 245
Main Authors Lamarche, Juliette, Lavenu, Arthur P.C., Gauthier, Bertrand D.M., Guglielmi, Yves, Jayet, Océane
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 18.12.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study aims at improving the understanding of fracture genesis in layered carbonate sedimentary sequences, focusing on field analysis of Jurassic to Maastrichtian age carbonates of Provence (France). Fracture patterns of 9 outcrops were characterized in 3D: 6 of Urgonian, 1 of Tithonian and 2 of Campanian-Late Maastrichtian ages. Seven sites are located in relatively weakly deformed areas away from larges fault and fold zones where strain partitioning and stress localization effects may take place. Two sites are located in fold flanks for the purpose of relative dating and for comparison with the sites in the weakly deformed areas. Patterns and detailed fracture attributes were compared to host rock sedimentary facies, porosity and P-wave velocities. Fracture chronology was determined with cross-cutting relationships and compared to burial/uplift history reconstructed from subsidence curves and from a regional structural analysis. Our results show that fractures are clustered in two perpendicular joint sets whatever the host rock age. We observe an average spacing of 20cm and no control of strike, age, facies, or bed thickness on fracture size. There is no mechanical stratigraphy. The fracture sequence compared to subsidence curves indicates that fractures occurred before tectonic inversion, during early and rapid burial, whatever the host rock age and facies. The abundance of burial stylolites does not correlate with maximum burial depth but with fracture frequency, host rock porosity and P-wave velocity. We conclude that the studied carbonates had early brittle properties controlled by their geographic position rather than by depositional facies types and undergone early diagenesis. The porosity loss/gain and the mechanical differentiation in carbonates of Provence could have been acquired during very early burial and diagenesis and have preserved through time. This study also demonstrates that regional fracturing is not necessarily driven by large scale structural events as it is often assumed in fractured reservoir modelling. ► Fractures initiated very early in the burial history whatever the age of the host rocks. ► No mechanical stratigraphy existed when fractures formed. ► Fracture frequency is related to the rock mechanical properties and porosity and varies from South to North emphasizing the prime role of shallow burial early diagenesis. ► One cannot systematically account for the present-day mechanical stratigraphy to predict fracture stratigraphy in carbonate reservoirs. ► Burial and diagenetic host rock history must be deciphered and considered.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0040-1951
1879-3266
DOI:10.1016/j.tecto.2012.06.042