Different Extraction Behaviors between Divalent and Trivalent Endohedral Metallofullerenes

On the basis of high-yield preparation, arc-produced soot containing endohedral Y, La, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Yb, Ca, and Ba fullerenes are successively extracted with carbon disulfide, N,N-dimethylformamide, pyridine, and aniline. The continuous four-step extraction procedure generates endohedral metallof...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChemistry of materials Vol. 16; no. 9; pp. 1704 - 1714
Main Authors Lian, Yongfu, Shi, Zujin, Zhou, Xihuang, Gu, Zhennan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Chemical Society 04.05.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:On the basis of high-yield preparation, arc-produced soot containing endohedral Y, La, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Yb, Ca, and Ba fullerenes are successively extracted with carbon disulfide, N,N-dimethylformamide, pyridine, and aniline. The continuous four-step extraction procedure generates endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs) with high content and abundant species, and novel EMFs such as Tb@C66, Yb@C60, and Tb3@C80 were extracted. This makes it possible for us to systemically study the varying extraction behaviors of divalent and trivalent metallofullerenes. Trivalent EMFs are characterized by higher content and multimetallofullerenes, whereas divalent species are characterized by lower content and solely monometallofullerenes. A positive relationship between the content and the species abundance of EMFs is proposed. The differences in extracting ability of the above solvents toward certain EMFs are summarized and explained on the basis of the number of transferred electrons from the encaged metal atom(s), the back-donation from carbon cages, and the solvent reduction of EMFs.
Bibliography:istex:6F8F62C8E91D1CDC2CC24DFB536C0D01AFB8CE9C
ark:/67375/TPS-SL5J318K-9
ISSN:0897-4756
1520-5002
DOI:10.1021/cm0344156