A study on the combination of satellite, airborne, and terrestrial gravity data

• Published in: Journal of geodesy Vol. 77; no. 3-4; pp. 217 - 225
• Main Authors: KERN, M, SCHWARZ, K. P, SNEEUW, N
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin Springer 01.06.2003; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Airborne particulates; Earth sciences; Earth, ocean, space; Exact sciences and technology; Geodetics; Gravity; Internal geophysics; Satellites; Solid-earth geophysics, tectonophysics, gravimetry; Terrestrial ecosystems; satellites; gravity field; Quasi-deterministic weight determination; accuracy; least-squares; satellite methods; Earth; Least-squares spectral combination; airborne methods; harmonics; gravity anomalies; solution; Gravity field determination; geoid; noise; ground methods; strategy; errors; geodesy
• ISSN: 0949-7714; 1432-1394
• DOI: 10.1007/s00190-003-0313-x

Satellite gravity missions, such as CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE, and airborne gravity campaigns in areas without ground gravity will enhance the present knowledge of the Earth's gravity field. Combining the new gravity information with the existing marine and ground gravity anomalies is a major task for which the mathematical tools have to be developed. In one way or another they will be based on the spectral information available for gravity data and noise. The integration of the additional gravity information from satellite and airborne campaigns with existing data has not been studied in sufficient detail and a number of open questions remain. A strategy for the combination of satellite, airborne and ground measurements is presented. It is based on ideas independently introduced by Sjöberg and Wenzel in the early 1980s and has been modified by using a quasi-deterministic approach for the determination of the weighting functions. In addition, the original approach of Sjöberg and Wenzel is extended to more than two measurement types, combining the Meissl scheme with the least-squares spectral combination. Satellite (or geopotential) harmonics, ground gravity anomalies and airborne gravity disturbances are used as measurement types, but other combinations are possible. Different error characteristics and measurement-type combinations and their impact on the final solution are studied. Using simulated data, the results show a geoid accuracy in the centimeter range for a local test area.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]