Statistical analysis of water-quality data containing multiple detection limits II: S-language software for nonparametric distribution modeling and hypothesis testing
Analysis of low concentrations of trace contaminants in environmental media often results in left-censored data that are below some limit of analytical precision. Interpretation of values becomes complicated when there are multiple detection limits in the data—perhaps as a result of changing analyti...
Saved in:
Published in | Computers & geosciences Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 696 - 704 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01.05.2007
Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Analysis of low concentrations of trace contaminants in environmental media often results in left-censored data that are below some limit of analytical precision. Interpretation of values becomes complicated when there are multiple detection limits in the data—perhaps as a result of changing analytical precision over time.
Parametric and semi-parametric methods, such as maximum likelihood estimation and robust regression on order statistics, can be employed to model distributions of multiply censored data and provide estimates of summary statistics. However, these methods are based on assumptions about the underlying distribution of data. Nonparametric methods provide an alternative that does not require such assumptions.
A standard nonparametric method for estimating summary statistics of multiply-censored data is the Kaplan–Meier (K–M) method. This method has seen widespread usage in the medical sciences within a general framework termed “survival analysis” where it is employed with right-censored time-to-failure data. However, K–M methods are equally valid for the left-censored data common in the geosciences.
Our S-language software provides an analytical framework based on K–M methods that is tailored to the needs of the earth and environmental sciences community. This includes routines for the generation of empirical cumulative distribution functions, prediction or exceedance probabilities, and related confidence limits computation. Additionally, our software contains K–M-based routines for nonparametric hypothesis testing among an unlimited number of grouping variables.
A primary characteristic of K–M methods is that they do not perform extrapolation and interpolation. Thus, these routines cannot be used to model statistics beyond the observed data range or when linear interpolation is desired. For such applications, the aforementioned parametric and semi-parametric methods must be used. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0098-3004 1873-7803 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cageo.2006.09.006 |