Synthesis of Poly(2-(methylsulfinyl)ethyl methacrylate) via Oxidation of Poly(2-(methylthio)ethyl methacrylate): Evaluation of the Sulfoxide Side Chain on Cryopreservation

• Published in: ACS polymers Au Vol. 2; no. 6; pp. 449 - 457
• Main Authors: Ishibe, Toru, Gonzalez-Martinez, Natalia, Georgiou, Panagiotis G., Murray, Kathryn A., Gibson, Matthew I.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Chemical Society 14.12.2022
• Subjects: macromolecular cryoprotectant; polymers; RAFT; DMSO; cryopreservation
• ISSN: 2694-2453; 2694-2453
• DOI: 10.1021/acspolymersau.2c00028

Conventional cryopreservation solutions rely on the addition of organic solvents such as DMSO or glycerol, but these do not give full recovery for all cell types, and innovative cryoprotectants may address damage pathways which these solvents do not protect against. Macromolecular cryoprotectants are emerging, but there is a need to understand their structure–property relationships and mechanisms of action. Here we synthesized and investigated the cryoprotective behavior of sulfoxide (i.e., “DMSO-like”) side-chain polymers, which have been reported to be cryoprotective using poly­(ethylene glycol)-based polymers. We also wanted to determine if the polarized sulfoxide bond (S+O– character) introduces cryoprotective effects, as this has been seen for mixed-charge cryoprotective polyampholytes, whose mechanism of action is not yet understood. Poly­(2-(methylsulfinyl)­ethyl methacrylate) was synthesized by RAFT polymerization of 2-(methylthio)­ethyl methacrylate and subsequent oxidation to sulfoxide. A corresponding N-oxide polymer was also prepared and characterized: (poly­(2-(dimethylamineoxide)­ethyl methacrylate). Ice recrystallization inhibition assays and differential scanning calorimetry analysis show that the sulfoxide side chains do not modulate the frozen components during cryopreservation. In cytotoxicity assays, it was found that long-term (24 h) exposure of the polymers was not tolerated by cells, but shorter (30 min) incubation times, which are relevant for cryopreservation, were tolerated. It was also observed that overoxidation to the sulfone significantly increased the cytotoxicity, and hence, these materials require a precision oxidation step to be deployed. In suspension cell cryopreservation investigations, the polysulfoxides did not increase cell recovery 24 h post-thaw. These results show that unlike hydrophilic backboned polysulfides, which can aid cryopreservation, the installation of the sulfoxide group onto a polymer does not necessarily bring cryoprotective properties, highlighting the challenges of developing and discovering macromolecular cryoprotectants.