In Situ Pore-Pressure Generation Behavior of Liquefiable Sand

To overcome current limitations in predicting in situ pore-pressure generation, a new field testing technique is used to measure directly the coupled, local response between the induced shear strains and the generated excess pore pressure. The pore-pressure generation characteristics from two in sit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering Vol. 133; no. 8; pp. 921 - 931
Main Authors Chang, Wen-Jong, Rathje, Ellen M, Stokoe, Kenneth H, Hazirbaba, Kenan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY American Society of Civil Engineers 01.08.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To overcome current limitations in predicting in situ pore-pressure generation, a new field testing technique is used to measure directly the coupled, local response between the induced shear strains and the generated excess pore pressure. The pore-pressure generation characteristics from two in situ liquefaction tests performed on field reconstituted specimens are presented, including the pore- pressure generation patterns at various strain levels, the observed stages of pore-pressure generation, and pore-pressure generation curves. Comparisons of the in situ pore-pressure generation curves with data in the literature and from laboratory strain-controlled, cyclic direct simple shear tests support the in situ testing results. In addition, the effects of effective confining stress on threshold shear strain and pore- pressure generation curves are discussed. Comparisons of the rate of pore-pressure generation among the in situ tests, laboratory strain-controlled tests, and a model based on stress-controlled tests reveal that in situ pore pressures generated in reconstituted soil specimens during dynamic loading develop more similarly to those from cyclic strain-controlled laboratory testing. This observation implies that the evaluation of induced strains rather than induced shear stresses may be more appropriate for the simulation of pore-pressure generation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1090-0241
1943-5606
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:8(921)