“q-NAVI”: A case of market-based implementation of structural health monitoring in Japan

In Japan, structural health monitoring (SHM) of building structures began in the 1950s, but, until recently, its widespread use was not realized. A new trend arrived a few years ago, and currently over 850 buildings have SHM systems installed. The most recent SHM systems have been installed voluntar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEarthquake spectra Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 160 - 179
Main Authors Kanda, Katsuhisa, Nakashima, Masayoshi, Suzuki, Yoshitaka, Ogasawara, Saori
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.02.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In Japan, structural health monitoring (SHM) of building structures began in the 1950s, but, until recently, its widespread use was not realized. A new trend arrived a few years ago, and currently over 850 buildings have SHM systems installed. The most recent SHM systems have been installed voluntarily by owners in the private sector; that is, the major development of recent Japanese SHM has been based on market forces. This article reports on why SHM was not accepted widely in the past, what were the keys for change of the atmosphere, how the building owners evaluate SHM after it is deployed, and what tangible benefits the building owners realize by experience on SHM implementation. To investigate those, an SHM system named q-NAVI is introduced as an example. The system has been deployed for 450 buildings, and they experienced a few significant shakings from recent earthquakes. SHM is also found effective for acquiring information on the quantification of fragility curves for various nonstructural components, using the data samples collected in recent earthquakes.
ISSN:8755-2930
1944-8201
DOI:10.1177/8755293020935884