Items in Context: Assessing the Dimensionality of Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices

The problem of dimensionality with respect to Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM) specifically and, more generally, g or fluid intelligence, has been a long-standing issue. The present article reports two studies examining the dimensionality of both the original Set II of the APM (n = 506) a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEducational and psychological measurement Vol. 65; no. 1; pp. 109 - 123
Main Authors Vigneau, François, Bors, Douglas A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publications 01.02.2005
Sage Publications
Sage
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The problem of dimensionality with respect to Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM) specifically and, more generally, g or fluid intelligence, has been a long-standing issue. The present article reports two studies examining the dimensionality of both the original Set II of the APM (n = 506) and a short form (n = 644), using principal component analysis and Rasch analysis. Although the results from the principal component analysis were equivocal, results from the Rasch analyses more strongly suggested that both forms of the test are best described as being multidimensional. Furthermore, comparison of items common to both forms indicated a context effect, thus making adaptive testing versions of this test difficult.
ISSN:0013-1644
1552-3888
DOI:10.1177/0013164404267286