The α-Effect in Methyl Transfers from S-Methyldibenzothiophenium Fluoroborate to Substituted N-Methylbenzohydroxamates

Studies of the α-effect show increased reactivity of nucleophiles having lone pairs of electrons on atoms neighboring the lone pair involved in reactivity when compared to the basicity of the nucleophiles. Hammett-type plots and Brönsted-type plots of substituted methylphenyl sulfates vs hydrogen pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of organic chemistry Vol. 68; no. 5; pp. 1810 - 1814
Main Authors Fountain, K. R, Felkerson, Cassie J, Driskell, Jeremy D, Lamp, Brian D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Chemical Society 07.03.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Studies of the α-effect show increased reactivity of nucleophiles having lone pairs of electrons on atoms neighboring the lone pair involved in reactivity when compared to the basicity of the nucleophiles. Hammett-type plots and Brönsted-type plots of substituted methylphenyl sulfates vs hydrogen peroxide anions and substituted N-methylbenzohydroxanates (NMBH) with substituted methylarenesulfonates or substituted arenedimethylsulfonium ions have large ρ or βnuc values, indicating a putative tightening of the usual SN2 transition states (anti-Hammond effect). Electrochemical studies of SN2-SET or reactivity indicate that SET character occurs in looser transition states, whereas SN2 transition states are associated with greater tightness. The α-effects for the series of sulfonium salts in completion reactions for 3-ClNMBH anions and 3-nitrophenolate anions are (log k α/k normal) 1.124 for dimethylphenyl sulfonium, 1.512 for dimethyl-1-naphthyl sulfonium, 1.835 for dimethyl-9-anthracenyl sulfonium, and 1.137 for S-methyldibenzylthiophenium. Correlations of the sizes of α-effects with typical SET (or ET) experimental parameters and the inverse dependence of the size of the α-effect on electron demand indicate inclusion of SET character in these SN2 transition states, vs no (or at least diminished) SET character in normal transition states. This dichotomy of tighter SN2 transition states, but looser SET transition states indicated in the α-effect, is examined in the present work.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/TPS-JN1Z6WFD-K
istex:43853185CEFE3A131F80B095F2D82333FE26EF52
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3263
1520-6904
DOI:10.1021/jo0206263